Avaliação da recuperação motora de pacientes hemiplégicos através do protocolo de desempenho físico Fugl-Meyer

Authors

  • Enio Walker Azevedo Cacho Fisioterapeuta, Mestrando pelo Departamento de Cirurgia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP.
  • Francisco Ricardo Lins Vieira de Melo Fisioterapeuta, Professor da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte - UFRN.
  • Roberta de Oliveira Fisioterapeuta, Especialista em Neurologia Adulto pela Universidade Estadual de Campinas – UNICAMP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34024/rnc.2004.v12.8877

Keywords:

Rehabilitation, Sensitive and motor assessment, Hemiplegic

Abstract

This study has the objective to evaluate and establish the motor accompaniment in hemiplegic patients through Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale. Ten subjects, age 40 to 80 years old, both sex, were selected for the study by the Physiotherapy Service of Onofre Lopes University Hospital of the Rio Grande do Norte Federal University, during January to June 1999. During six months the patients received physiotherapy treatment three times for week. All patients (acute phase) in the admission received an initial assessment that repeated after 30, 60,105 and 150 days of the first. The Fugl-Meyer Scale evaluates five impairment measure including three motor control aspects like joint amplitude, pain, sensibility, upper and lower extremities motor impairment and balance. Dates demonstrated limitation in joint amplitude from the second assessment, always because of pain. In 30% the sensitive deficit in the first evaluation disappeared in second one. The motor recovery of upper and lower limbs was above 50 and 70%, respectively, in the last period. Wrist-hand motor recovery accompanied the development of shoulder-arm segment in 70% of the subjects. Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale demonstrated to be able to evaluated and measures the motor impairment of hemiplegic patient presenting effective in the collect, accompaniment and comprehension of evolution dates.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Basmajian J V. Exercícios Terapêuticos. 3 ed. São Paulo, Manole, 1987, 757p.

Cunha Jr. I T, Lim P A, Qureshy H, Henson H, Monga T, Protas, E J. Gait outcomes after acute stroke rehabilitation with supported treadmill ambulation training: a randomized controlled pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 83: 1258-65, 2002.

Trombly C A. Deficit of reaching in subjects with left hemiparesis: a pilot study. Am J Occup Ther, 46: 887-97, 1992.

Bourbonnais D, Vanden Noven S. Weakness in patient with hemiparesis. Am J Occup Ther, 43: 313-19, 1989.

Wisendanger M. Weakness and upper motoneurone syndrome: a critical pathophysiological appraisal. In: Berardelli A, Benecke R, Manfredi M, Marsden C D, editors. Motor Disturbances II. London, Academic Press, 1990, pp.319-331.

Di Fábio R P, Badke M B, Duncan P W. Adapting human postural reflexes following localized cerebrovascular lesion: analysis of bilateral long latency responses. Brain Res, 363: 257-64, 1986.

Bobath B. Adult hemiplegia: evaluation and treatment. 3 ed. Oxford, Heinemann Medical, 1990.

Ryerson S, Levit K. The shoulder in hemiplegia. In: Donatelli R, editor. Physical therapy of the shoulder. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1987, pp.105-31.

Kunkel A, Kopp B. Constraint-Induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehab, 80: 624-28, 1999.

Mudie M H, Matyas T A. Can simultaneous bilateral movement involve the undamaged hemisphere in reconstruction of neural networks damaged by stroke? Disab Rehab, 22: 23-37, 2000.

Michaelsen S M, Luta A, Roby-Brami A, Levin M F. Effects of trunk restraint on the recovery of reaching movements in hemiparetic patients. Stroke, 32: 1875 – 83, 2001.

Cirstea M C, Ptito A, Levin M F. Arm reaching improvements with shortterm practice depend on the severity of the motor deficit in stroke. Exp Brain Res, 152: 476 – 88, 2003.

Collin C, Wade D T, Davies S, et al. The Barthel ADL Index: a reability study. Inter Disab Studies, 10: 61-3, 1988.

Granger C, Hamilton B B. Measurement of stroke rehabilitation outcome in the 1980’s. Stroke, 21: 1146 – 47, 1990.

Wolf S L, Lecraw D E, Barton L A, et al. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol, 104: 125 –32, 1989.

Koop B, Kunkel A, Flor H, et al. The Arm Motor Ability Test: reabiliaty, validity and sensibivity to change of an instrument for assessing disabilities in activities of daily living. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 78: 615 – 20, 1997.

Brunnström S. Motor testing procedures in hemiplegia. J Am Phys Ther Assoc, 46: 357-75, 1966.

Fugl-Meyer A R, Jääskö L, Leyman I, et al. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. Scand J Rehab Med, 7: 13 – 31, 1975.

Bobath B. Hemiplegia no adulto: avaliação e tratamento. São Paulo, Manole, 1978, 181p.

Duncan P W, Propst M, Nelson S G. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assement of sensoriomotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther, 63: 1606-10, 1983.

Dekker J H M, Wagenaar R C, Lankhorst G J, et al. The painful hemiplegic shoulder: effects of intra-articular triamcinolone acetonide. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 76 (1): 43 – 48, 1997.

Sterzi R. Hemianopia, hemianesthesia and hemiplegia after right and left hemisphere damage. A hemisphere difference. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych, 56: 308 – 10, 1993.

Smania N, Montagnana B, Faccioli S. Rehabilitation of somatic and related deficit of motor control in patients with pure sensory stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehab, 84: 1692 – 1702, 2003.

Zeman B D, Yiannikas C. Functional prognosis in stroke: use of somatosensory evoker potentials. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych, 52: 242 – 47, 1989.

Twitchell T E. The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia in man. Brain, p. 443 – 80, 1951.

Olsen T S. Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke, 21: 247 –51, 1990.

Dewald J P A, Pope P S, Given J D, et al. Abnormal muscle coactivation patterns during isometric torque generation at the elbow and shoulder in hemiparetic subjects. Brain, 118: 495 – 510, 1995.

Dombovy M L. Rehabilitation and the course of recovery after stroke. In: Whisnant J P, editor. Stroke: populations, cohorts and clinical trials. Oxford, England, Butterworth-Heinemann, 1993, pp. 218 – 37.

Duncan P W, Goldstein L B, Horner R D, et al. Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke, 23: 1181 – 88, 1994.

Fugl-Meyer A R. Post-stroke hemiplegia assessment of properties. Scand J Rehab Med, 7: 85 – 93, 1981.

Kusoffsky A, Wadell I, Nilsson B Y. The relationship between sensory impairment and motor recovery in patients with hemiplegia. Scand J Rehab Med,14: 27 – 32. 1982.

Di Fábio R P, Badke M B. Relationship of sensory organization to balance function in patients with hemiplegia. Phys Ther, 70: 20 – 6, 1990.

Mills V M, Cassidy J W, Katz D I. Neurologic rehabilitation: a guide to diagnosis, prognosis and treatment planning. Malden, Blackwell Science, 1997, 375p

Published

2004-06-30

How to Cite

Cacho, E. W. A., Melo, F. R. L. V. de, & Oliveira, R. de. (2004). Avaliação da recuperação motora de pacientes hemiplégicos através do protocolo de desempenho físico Fugl-Meyer. Revista Neurociências, 12(2), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.34024/rnc.2004.v12.8877

Issue

Section

Artigos Originais
##plugins.generic.dates.received## 2019-02-05
##plugins.generic.dates.published## 2004-06-30

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.