DOS: A NOTE ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE GENERAL AND THE PARTICULAR IN ART HISTORY

Authors

  • Luiz César de Sá Departamento de Historia y del Programa de Posgrado en Historia de la Universidad de Brasilia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34024/imagem.v1i1.14163

Keywords:

Panofsky, Burckhardt, Historiography of Art, Artistic Volition, Institution

Abstract

The goal of this research note is to point out the problem of the relationship between general and particular in the historiography of art from the contrast between paradigms developed in the writings of Erwin Panofsky and some of their repercussions in both Art History and other disciplines in the Humanities. We seek to suggest that the privileged relationship
with the “Renaissance” as a historical epoch forged by Jacob Burckhardt triggered a series of analytical principles linked to
the notion of “intuition”, which are explored here from the res- ponses to the challenge posed by the concept of “artistic voli- tion” in the 20th century.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Barthes, R. (1960). Histoire et littérature: à propos de Racine. Annales. Économies, sociétés, civilisations, 3.

Bodart, D. (1990). Préface. In E. Panofsky. Titien: questions d’iconologie. Paris: Hazan, 1990.

Bourdieu, P. (1970). Postface. In E. Panofsky. Architecture gothique et pensée scolastique. Paris: Minuit.

Coli, J. (2018). O corpo da liberdade. São Paulo: SESC-SP Editora.

Descola, P. (2021). Les formes du visible. Paris: Seuil.

Didi-Huberman, G. (2008). L’exorciste. In M. Ghelardi, G. Didi-Huberman, R. Recht, M. Warnke, & D. Wuttke. (Org.). Relire Panofsky. Paris: Éditions Beaux-Arts de Paris.

Fernandes, C. (2008). O humanismo em Basileia e a obra de Jacob Burckhardt. Em F. Varella; H. Mollo; S. Mata; V. Araújo (orgs.). A dinâmica do historicismo. Belo Horizonte: Argumentum.

Ghelardi, M., Castelnuovo, E. (2015). 97 battle road. In E. Panofsky. Il significato nelle arti visive. Torino: Einaudi.

Ghelardi, M. (2008). La violence de l’interprète. In M. Ghelardi ; G. Didi-Huberman; M. Warnke ; D. Wuttke (orgs.). Relire Panofsky. Paris: Musée du Louvre Éditions, 2008.

Holly, M. A. (1988). Burckhardt and the ideology of the past. History of the Human Sciences, 1(1).

Levine, E. (2013a). Dreamland of humanists: Warburg, Cassirer, Panofsky, and the Hamburg School. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Levine, E. J. (2013b, April). The other Weimar: the Warburg circle as Hamburg school. Journal of the history of ideas, 74(2), 314-315.

Moxey, K. (1986, Winter). Panofsky’s concept of “iconology” and the problem of interpretation in the History of Art. New Literary History, 17(2).

Panofsky, E. (1981). The concept of artistic volition. Trad. Kenneth J. Northcott e Joel Snyder. Critical Inquiry, 8(1).

Panofsky, E. (2009). Significado nas artes visuais. São Paulo: Perspectiva.

Sciolla, G. C. (1995). La Critica d’Arte del Novecento. Torino: UTET.

Settis, S. (2000). Warburg continuatus: descrição de uma biblioteca. Em M. Baratin, C. Jacob. O poder das bibliotecas: a memória dos livros no Ocidente. Rio de Janeiro: EdUFRJ.

Warnke, M. (2008). L’histoire de l’art en tant qu’art. In M. Ghelardi, G. Didi-Huberman, R. Recht, M. Warnke, & D. Wuttke.

(Org.). Relire Panofsky. Paris: Les éditions du Musée du Louvre.Wood, C. S. (2019). A history of art history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Capa da primeira edição da Imagem: Revista da Arte

Downloads

Published

2022-08-12

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Imagem: Revista de História da Arte

Section

Thematic Dossier

How to Cite

de Sá, L. C. (2022). DOS: A NOTE ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE GENERAL AND THE PARTICULAR IN ART HISTORY. Imagem: Revista De História Da Arte, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.34024/imagem.v1i1.14163