Neuroscience in Brazil
Vocational Researcher or Academic Survival?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34024/rnc.2013.v21.8214Keywords:
Neuroscience, Science, ResearchersAbstract
It is extremely difficult to evaluate the scientific production of neuroscience in Brazil from the point of view of quantitative as well as qualitative. Nowadays, there is no doubt that there have been considerable research scenery changes in Brazil, especially from the international impact. The purpose of the present study is make a provocative discussion regarding differences between vocation of true researcher and researchers associated to the industry and academy. Within the competitive environment, we believe that the vocation of the researcher should prevail but, no doubt, will suffer influence from the marketing, with repercussion on the professional decision. At present there are still scientific leaders that look for personal interests causing damage in the real potential of the future researcher
Metrics
References
Bacheschi LA, Guerreiro CAM. Situação das neurociências no Brasil: neurociências clínicas. Cienc Cult 2004; 56:25-31.
Ventura DF. Situação das neurociências no Brasil: disciplinas básicas. Cienc Cult 2004:56:25-26.
Andrey MA, Micheletto N, Sério TMP, Rubano DR, Moroz M, Pereira ME, et al. Para compreender a ciência: uma perspectiva histórica. 6ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Espaço e Tempo; 1996, p.138.
Manguel A. Nuevo elogio de la locura. Buenos Aires: Lumen, 2006, p.87.
Collet N, Rozendo CA. Questões metodológicas da pesquisa no campo da saúde. Rev Latinoam Enferm 2001;9:106-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692001000300017
Toninato MAD. Desafios éticos e bioéticos da neurociência. Bioetikos (Centro Universitário São Camilo 2007; 1:88-95.
Battro A. Culturas influenciam de maneira diferente áreas do córtex cerebral. São Leopoldo, 2006, p.19.
Rasslan S. O pesquisador-médico: da academia às parcerias. Rev Assoc Med Bras 1999;45:93-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-42301999000200001
Sánchez-Andrés JV, Viguera C. Análisis: factor de impacto y comunicación científica. Rev Neurol 2009;49:57.
Migueles CP. Pesquisa: por que administradores precisam entender disto? São Leopoldo: Nova Harmonia, 2003, 152p.
Mores RV. In defense of imaginative research programs in the education of young researchers. Interface 2007;11:105-18.
Rocha-e-Silva M. O Novo Qualis, que não tem nada a ver com a ciência do Brasil: carta aberta ao presidente da CAPES. Clinics [online] 2009; 64(8) [citado 2009-11-04]:721-4.
Orsini M, Reis CHM. Ciência de la supervivencia. Rev Neurol 2009;49:503-4.
Macdonald S, Kam J. Aardvark et al: quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies. J Info Sci 2007;33:702-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165551507077419
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
##plugins.generic.dates.published## 2013-03-31