Comportamento pró-ambiental na agricultura e implicações à Educação Ambiental: revisão de literatura

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34024/revbea.2021.v16.11408

Palavras-chave:

Agricultura sustentável, Psicologia ambiental, Educação ambiental

Resumo

Esse estudo visou analisar as produções científicas sobre o comportamento pró-ambiental na agricultura e descrever os principais fatores pessoais e ambientais associados. Foram utilizadas as palavras-chave: comportamento pró-ambiental e pro-environmental behavior nas principais bases de dados disponíveis. As principais condições associadas ao comportamento pró-ambiental foram de natureza intrínsecas, como os valores biosféricos, consciência ambiental, orientação para o futuro, autoeficácia e conhecimento. A promoção de políticas públicas de incentivo ao comportamento pró-ambiental, aliadas à educação ambiental propulsora de valores ambientais, estimulam às práticas agrícolas sustentáveis.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Ana Paula da Silva Siqueira, Universidade Cesumar

Mestre pelo Programa de Pós-graduação em Tecnologias Limpas (PPGTL) na Universidade Cesumar (Unicesumar).

Bianca Ramos Meira, Universidade Cesumar

Universidade Estadual de Maringá.

Tiago Teixeira da Silva Siqueira, National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment (INRAE)

Université de Toulouse

Edneia Aparecida de Souza Paccola, Universidade Cesumar

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Tecnologias Limpas. Pesquisadora do Instituto Cesumar de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (ICETI). Bolsista Produtividade em Pesquisa do ICETI

Rute Grossi-Milani, Universidade Cesumar

Programas de Pós-Graduação em Promoção da Saúde e Tecnologias Limpas. Pesquisadora do Instituto Cesumar de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (ICETI). Bolsista Produtividade em Pesquisa do ICETI

Referências

ADNAN, N. et al. Adoption of green fertilizer technology among paddt farmers: A possible solution for Malaysian food security. Land and Policy, v. 63, p. 38-52, 2017a.

ADNAN, N.; NORDIN, S.M.; BIN ABU BAKAR, Z. Understanding and facilitating sustainable agricultural practice: A comprehensive analysis of adoption behavior among Malaysian paddy farmers. Land use policy, v. 68, p. 372-382, 2017b.

AJZEN, I.; FISHBEIN, M. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1980.

ALCOCK, I. et al. Associations between pro-environmental behaviour and neighbourhood nature, nature visit frequency and nature appreciation: Evidence from a nationally representative survey in England. Environment International, v. 136, n. 1, p. 105441, 2020.

ARORA, P. et al. Ownership effect in the wild: Influence of land ownership on agribusiness goals and decisions in the Argentine Pampas. Journal of behavioral and experimental economics, v. 58, p. 162-170, 2015.

BERNSTEIN, J.; SZUSTER, B.W. The new environmental paradigm scale: Reassessing the operationalization of contemporary environmentalism. The Journal of Environmental Education, v. 50, n. 2, p. 73-83, 2019.

BEZERRA, Y.R.N.; FEITOSA, M.Z.S. A afetividade do agente comunitário de saúde no território: um estudo com os mapas afetivos. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, v. 23, p. 813-822, 2018.

BIJANI, M. et al. Pro-environmental analysis of farmers’ concerns and behaviors towards soil conservation in central district of Sari County, Iran. International soil and water conservation research, v. 5, n. 1, p. 43-49, 2017.

BJORNLUND, H.; PARRACK, C.; DE LOE, R.C. Segmenting the Urban and Rural Populations of Southern Alberta for Improved Understanding of Policy Preferences for Water Reallocation. Society & Natural Resources, v. 26, p. 1330-1350, 2013.

BROWN, P.; ROPER, S. Innovation and networks in New Zealand farming. Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics, v. 61, p. 422-442, 2017.

CARY, J.; ROBERTS, A. The limitations of environmental management systems in Australian agriculture. Journal of environmental management, v. 92, n. 3, p. 878-875, 2011.

CHEN, G.; GULLY, S.M.; EDEN, D. Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale. Organizational Research Methods, v. 4, n. 1, p. 62-83, 2001.

CHIERRITO-ARRUDA, E. et al. Comportamento pró-ambiental e reciclagem: revisão de literatura e apontamentos para as políticas públicas. Ambiente & Sociedade, v. 21, p. 1-18, 2018.

CLAYTON, S. et al. Expanding the role for psychology in addressing environmental challenges. American Psychologist, v. 71, n. 3, p. 199, 2016.

CORRAL, V. La definición del comportamiento proambiental. La Psicología Social en México, v. 8, n. 1, p. 466-472, 2000.

LIMA, G. C. O discurso da sustentabilidade e suas implicações para a educação. Ambiente & Sociedade, Campinas, v. 6, n. 2, p. 99-119, dez. 2003.

FLORESS, K. et al. Toward a theory of farmer conservation attitudes: Dual interests and willingness to take action to protect water quality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, v. 53, p. 73-80, 2017.

FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS – FAO. The state of food and agriculture 1995. Rome, Italy, 1995. ISBN 92-5-103700-0. Disponível em: <http://www.fao.org/docrep/017/v6800e/v6800e.pdf>. Acesso em: 30 set. 2018.

GARCÍA-LLORENTE, M. et al. Social farming in the promotion of social-ecological sustainability in rural and periurban areas. Sustainability, v. 8, n. 12, p. 1238, 2016.

GOULD, R. K. et al. Environmental Behavior’s Dirty Secret: The Prevalence of Waste Management in Discussions of Environmental Concern and Action. Environmental Management, v. 58, n. 2. p. 268-282, 2016.

GUEVARA-HERNANDEZ, F. Propuesta metodológica para el estudio de actores y estrategias de intervención tecnológica en Chiapas, México. Cultivos tropicales, v. 38, n. 2, p. 103-112, 2017.

HACKETT, P.MW. Modeling environmental concern: Theory and application. The Environmentalist, v.13, n. 2, p.117-120, 1993.

HARBER, K. D.; ZIMBARDO, P. G.; BODY, J. N. Participant self-selection biases as a function of individual differences in time perspective. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, v. 25, n. 3, p. 255-264, 2003.

HONING, M. et al. The conditions under which farmers are likely to adapt their behavior: A case study of private land conservation in the Cape Wine lands, South Africa. Land use policy, v. 48, p. 389-400, 2015.

HYLAND, J. J. et al. Farmers´ perceptions of climate change: identifying types. Agriculture and Human values, v. 33, n. 2, p. 323-339, 2016.

INTERNATIONAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE – IPCC. Fifth assessment report. 2014. Disponível em: <http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/index.shtml>. Acesso em: 30 jul. 2018.

JIANG, L. et al. The impact of psychological factors on farmers’ intentions to reuse agricultural biomass waste for carbon emission abatement. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 189, n. 1, p. 797-804, 2018.

KLÖCKNER, C.A. A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behavior-A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change, v.23. n. 5, p. 1028-1038, 2013.

MARTIN, C.; CZELLAR, S. Where do biospheric values come from? A connectedness to nature perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, v. 52, n. 1, p. 56-68, 2017.

MARTÍNEZ-SOTO, J. Comportamiento proambiental. Una aproximación al estudio del desenvolvimento sustentable con énfasis en el comportamiento persona-ambiente. Theomai, n. 99, 2004.

MOHER, D. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, v. 4, n. 1, 2015.

MORGAN, M. I. et al. Landholder adoption of low emission agricultural practices: A profiling approach. Journal of Environmental Psychology, v. 41, p. 35-44, 2015.

NGUYEN, T. N.; LOBO, A.; GREENLAND, S. Pro-environmental purchase behaviour: The role of consumers' biospheric values. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, v. 33, p. 98-108, 2016.

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT, OECD. Environmental Performance Reviews: New Zealand. OECD Publishing, Paris, 2017.

PRICE, J.C.; LEVISTON, Z. Predicting pro-environmental agricultural practices: The social, psychological and contextual influences on land management. Journal of rural studies, v. 34, p. 65-78, 2014.

PROGRAMA DAS NAÇÕES UNIDAS PARA O DESENVOLVIMENTO – PNUD. Os Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Disponível em: <http://www.pnud.org.br/ODS.aspx>. Acesso em: 10 jul. 2018.

RAMANKUTTY, N. et al. Trends in global agricultural land use: implications for environmental health and food security. Annual review of plant biology, v. 69, n. 1, p. 789-815, 2018.

SCHUPP, J.L.; SHARP, J.S. Exploring the social bases of home gardening. Agriculture and human values, v. 29, p. 93-105, 2012.

SONCINI, A.; PIERINI, A.J.; GALLO, Z. A compreensão dos alunos ao primeiro ano de Agronomia sobre Agroecologia: uma análise do presente e perspecticas de futuro. Retratos de Assentamentos, v. 19, n. 2, 2016.

STERN, P.C.; DIETZ, T.; GUAGNANO, G.A. A brief inventory of values. Educational and psychological measurement, v.58, p. 984-1001, 1998.

SUMANE, S. et al. Local and farmers' knowledge matters! How integrating informal and formal knowledge enhances sustainable and resilient agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies, v. 59, p. 232-241, 2018.

SWAMI, V. et al. Egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric environmental concerns: a path analytic investigation of their determinants. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, v. 51, n. 2, p. 139-45, 2010.

SZUMELDA, A.U. Agriculture and everyday realities on small farms–An entrepreneurial challenge to farmers between the desire for autonomy and a secure existence. Two examples from east and south-east Poland. Journal of Rural Studies, v. 67, n. 1, p. 57-68, 2019.

THOGERSON, J.; CROMPTON, T. Simple and painless? The limitations of spillover in environmental campaigning. Journal of Consumer Policy, v. 32, p. 141-146, 2009.

THOMPSON, S.C.G.; BARTON, M.A. Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, v. 14, n. 2, p. 149-157, 1994.

WU, D. W; DIGIACOMO, A.; KINGSTONE, A. A Sustainable Building Promotes Pro-Environmental Behavior: An Observational Study on Food Disposal. PLoS ONE, v. 8, n. 1, 2013.

ZACARIAS, E.F.J.; HIGUCHI, M.I.G. Relação pessoa-ambiente: caminhos para uma vida sustentável. Interações (Campo Grande), Campo Grande, v. 18, n. 3, p. 121-129, Sept. 2017.

ZEWELD, W. et al. Smallholder farmer´s behavioural intentions towards sustainable agricultural practices. Journal of Environmental Management, v. 187, p. 71-81, 2017.

ZIMBARDO, P.G.; KEOUGH, K.A.; BODY, J.N. Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences, v. 23, n. 6, p. 1007-1023, 1997.

Downloads

Publicado

2021-06-01

Como Citar

Siqueira, A. P. da S. ., Meira, B. R. ., Siqueira, T. T. da S. ., Paccola, E. A. de S. ., & Grossi-Milani, R. (2021). Comportamento pró-ambiental na agricultura e implicações à Educação Ambiental: revisão de literatura. Revista Brasileira De Educação Ambiental (RevBEA), 16(3), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.34024/revbea.2021.v16.11408

Edição

Seção

Artigos

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)