Conveying different types of values via mathematical tasks

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34024/prometeica.2023.27.15310

Keywords:

mathematics teaching, tasks, social values, epistemology, mathematics education

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyse possibilities of including and conveying a variety of values in teaching mathematics through tasks in terms of their openness. In the first part of the introduction we present the theoretical ideas about values in mathematics education by Bishop and Lim & Ernest. The second part of introduction sets out the reasons why an emphasis on values seems advisable. Mathematics is not commonly associated with a variety of values. However, for mathematical education an orientation towards societal demands appear relevant. Scholars like Skovsmose and Fischer alike demanded the development of a reflecting ability. Some national state curricula depict some of the societal demands by calling for an orientation towards general values for all school subjects, but in this we see discrepancies to practiced teaching. The section “Tasks and Values” relates to justifying why tasks appear to be a useful means of influencing mathematics education. Several scholars have already investigated the possibilities of different task-types for teaching values. Here we connect this purpose to tasks characterized by their varying openness. As teachers are essential to unfold the potential of tasks, the present analysis is intendent to give them concrete ideas for mediating values in mathematics classes. In the main part we analyse traditional tasks from ancient textbooks, with experiences in Armenian classes, as well as an open task with experiences of Austrian students in partner work. The discussed tasks provide opportunities for mathematical values like control, openness and for epistemological values as well as for more general values like self-confidence, mutual respect, justice and mathematics educational values like accuracy and consistency. In conclusion, the encouragement towards discussions among and with the students during the solving process of the task appears to be essential. Our experiences show that students mainly react positively towards such discussing activities. This could be a motivation for teachers to take up this issue besides of idealistic reasons.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Aghamaleants, S. (1781). Թուաբանութիւն [Arithmetic]. Demetriay Theodosiants․

Algani, Y. M. (2019). Teaching values via the problem-solving approach in mathematics. International Journal of Latest Research in Engineering and Technology (05/10), 1–11.

Bishop, A. (2001). What values do you teach when you teach mathematics? In P. Gates (Ed.), Issues in mathematics teaching (pp. 93–104). Routledge.

Bishop, A., FitzSimons G., Seah W.T., Clarkson, C. (1999). Values in mathematics education: Making values teaching explicit in the mathematics classroom. Paper presented at the Combined Annual Meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education and the New Zealand Association for Research in Education, Melbourne, Australia.

Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung (2023). Lehrplan der allgemeinbildenden höheren Schule. Fassung vom 20.01.2023. [Curriculum of the general secondary school. Version from 20.01.2023] https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/

GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10008568

Daher, W. (2020). Values in the mathematics classroom, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 52(3), 284–299.

Fischer, R. (2012). Fächerorientierte Allgemeinbildung: Entscheidungskompetenz und Kommunikationsfähigkeit mit ExpertInnen [Subject-oriented general education: Ability to make decisions and communicate with experts]. In R. Fischer, U. Greiner & H. Bastel (Eds.), Domänen fächerorientierter Allgemeinbildung (pp. 9–17). Trauner.

Folkerts, M., Fraser, C. G., & Gray, J. J. (2022, August 24). Mathematics. Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/mathematics

Lim, C. H. P., & Ernest, P. (1997). Values in mathematics education: What is planned and what is espoused? In British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics (Ed.), Proceedings of the Day Conference held at the University of Nottingham, 1 March (pp. 37–44).

Mikaelian, H. (2011). Բարոյական արժեքները և մաթեմատիկայի կրթական ներուժը [Moral values and educational potential of mathematics]. Edit Print.

Mikaelian, H. (2018). Մաթեմատիկական կրթության արժեբանական հիմունքները։ Մաս 1․ Արժեքներ և արժեքային հարաբերություններ [The value bases of mathematical education. Part I: Values and value relations]. Edit Print.

Mikaelian, H., & Yenokyan, A. (2021). The problem of formation of moral values in the process of teaching mathematics In D. Kollosche (Ed.), Exploring new ways to connect (Vol. 2, pp. 662–670). Tredition. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5415473

Nimmervoll, L. (2021, May 23). Erben mit Verantwortung: Millionenerbin Marlene Engelhorn: „Besteuert mich endlich!“ [Heirs with responsibility. Millionaire heiress Marlene Engelhorn: „Tax me now!“]. Der Standard. https://www.derstandard.at/

story/2000126792517/millionenerbin-marlene-engelhorn-besteuert-mich-endlich

Papikean, H. (1875). Տարերք չափաբերութեան։ Գրահաշիւ կամ ալճեպրա [Elements of measurement: Algebra]. Mekhitarists.

Papikean, H. (1863). Տարերք չափաբերութեան ի պէտս ազգային վարժարանաց. թուաբանութիւն [Elements of measurement for the national schools: Arithmetic]. Mekhitarists.

Pehkonen, E. (2017). Open tasks in mathematics: Experiences with one problem field. Magistra Iadertina, (12), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.15291/magistra.1487

Plunger, C. (2021). Students dealing with tasks aiming at model- and context-oriented reflections. An explorative investigation. In D. Kollosche (Ed.), Exploring new ways to connect (Vol. 3, pp. 787–798). Tredition. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.

Plunger, C. (in press). Was ist ein geeignetes Zentralmaß für die Anzahl von Facebook-Freunden österreichischer Facebook-User? [What is a suitable central measure for the number of Facebook friends of Austrian Facebook users?] In, Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht 2022. auf der 56. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Didaktik der Mathematik. WTM.

Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of justice: Revised Edition. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvkjb25m

Schneider, E. (2019). Thinking about – making sense: Reflecting in mathematics lessons – why, about what, how. In D. Glasnovic-Gracin & G. Trupcevic (Eds.), Proceedings of the symposia New Challenges in Mathematics Teaching (pp. 2–12). Sveučilište u Zagrebu, Učiteljski fakultet.

Seah, W. T., Bishop, A., FitzSimons, G., Clarkson, P. (2001). Exploring issues of control over values teaching in the mathematics classroom. Paper presented at the 2001 Annual Conference of the Australian Association for research in Education, Fremantle, Australia.

Skovsmose, O. (2020a). Banalty of mathematical expertise. ZDM, 52, 1187–1197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01168-4

Skovsmose, O. (2020b). Three narratives about mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 40(1), 47–51.

Sullivan, P., Clarke, D., & Clarke, B. (2013). Teaching with tasks for effective mathematics learning. Springer.

Taplin, M. (1998). Promoting education in human values in the regular mathematics classroom. EduMath 7 (12/98). 59–72.

Taplin, M. (2020). Teaching values through a problem solving approach to mathe¬matics. Math Goodies. https://www.mathgoodies.com/articles/teaching_values.

Yenokyan, A. (2019). Բարոյական արժեքների ձևավորումը մաթեմատիկայի ուսուցման գործընթացում [Formation of moral values in the teaching process of mathematics] [Doctoral dissertation]. Armenian State Pedagogical University, Yerevan, Armenia. http://etd.asj-oa.am/10768/

Downloads

Published

2023-07-27

Issue

No. 27 (2023): Prometeica - nº 27 (07/2023 - 10/2023)

Section

Articles - Dossier 1

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Cornelia Plunger, Anahit Yenokyan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright: Prometeica allows the author (s) to keep their copyrights unrestricted. Prometeica allows the author (s) to retain their publication rights without restriction. Authors should ensure that the article is an original work without fabrication, fraud or plagiarism; does not infringe any copyright or right of ownership of any third party. Authors should also ensure that each one complies with the authorship requirements as recommended by the ICMJE and understand that if the article or part of it is flawed or fraudulent, each author shares responsibility.

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

Prometeica - Journal of Philosophy and Sciences is governed by the licencse CC-By-NC

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

 

Copyright maintenance

Prometeica allows the author (s) to keep their copyright without restrictions.

Prometeica allows the author (s) to retain their publication rights without restriction.

How to Cite

Plunger, C., & Yenokyan, A. (2023). Conveying different types of values via mathematical tasks. Prometeica - Journal of Philosophy and Science, 27, 336-346. https://doi.org/10.34024/prometeica.2023.27.15310