Politics, Parliament, and the Penalty of the Lash

The Significance of the End of Flogging in 1886

Authors

  • Jeffrey D. Needell University of Florida (College of Liberal Arts and Sciences)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/2236-463320120406

Keywords:

Abolitionism, slavery, pena de açoites

Abstract

The Brazilian penalty of the lash was reformed (1886) by a cabinet and
parliament opposed to abolition. While the penalty’s abuse had been
exploited by Abolitionists attempting the cabinet’s fall, the cabinet
unexpectedly supported its reform. This apparent contradiction has
not been satisfactorily addressed; this article attempts to do so. It will
demonstrate that the cabinet’s support was a cabinet tactic designed to
vindicate the cabinet’s policies and strength. Nonetheless, the revocation
of the state’s role in flogging delegitimizing flogging on plantations,
too, despite the cabinet’s expectations. Indeed, the reform impacted
plantation destabilization, which helped lead to the cabinet’s fall and the
1888 law abolishing slavery. This complex series of events illustrates the
Abolitionist struggle’s interweave between parliament, the movement,
and slave agency.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2022-01-16

How to Cite

Needell, J. D. . (2022). Politics, Parliament, and the Penalty of the Lash: The Significance of the End of Flogging in 1886. Almanack, (4). https://doi.org/10.1590/2236-463320120406

Issue

Section

Artigos

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.