Experiencing Critical Mathematics Education

Changes in students’ perspectives on the relevance of mathematics

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34024/prometeica.2023.27.15291

Keywords:

critical mathematics education, Relevance, students' perspectives

Abstract

When students ponder why they consider it relevant to learn math it becomes apparent that their attributions of relevance do not meet what educational policies state as goals. While they generally consider the subject to be important, their explanations why they do so are limited to only elementary mathematical skills needed in everyday life or unspecified skills for later work life, rarely connecting them to broader societal topics. Integrating Critical Mathematics Education (CME) tasks into math lessons might be a chance to let attributions of relevance evolve further. This contribution shows in how far the students’ perspectives on the relevance of math changed after they experienced several CME units. 16 students from three different schools have participated in two rounds of interviews where they have been asked about their image of math and math learning and if and what they consider relevant. Within the second round of interviews, after they experienced several CME units, additional questions about their experiences in these lessons have been added. The analysis shows that students’ general attribution of relevance did not change considerably. However, effects could be identified in their reflections about the CME units. Students talked about how these units let them experience a connection between math and societal topics that leads to a more personal and direct relevance of math for their lives. However, their understanding of what counts as doing math might hinder them to easily transfer their experiences within these units to their general attributions of relevance of math. If teachers regularly include CME tasks into their math lessons and make reflections on what mathematical activities have been applied to make sense of them an integral part of instruction, CME seems to offer the opportunity for students to broaden their conceptions of math and experience connections between math and societal topics more clearly.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Agüero-Calvo, E., Meza-Cascante, L. G., & Suárez-Valdés-Ayala, Z. (2017). Attitude toward usefulness of mathematics of Costa Rican high school students. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 7(8).

Andersson, A., & Barwell, R. (2021). Applying critical mathematics education: An introduction. In A. Andersson & R. Barwell (Eds.), New directions in mathematics & science education: Applying critical mathematics education (pp. 1–23). Brill.

Brantlinger, A. (2013). Between politics and equations. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1050–1080.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Brown, R. (2009). Teaching for social justice: Exploring the development of student agency through participation in the literacy practices of a mathematics classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(3), 171–185.

BMBWF (Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung). Verordnung des Bundesministers für Unterricht und Kunst vom 14. November 1984 über die Lehrpläne der allgemeinbildenden höheren Schulen, BGBl. Nr. 88/1985.

Canning, E. A., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2015). Teach it, don’t preach it: The differential effects of directly-communicated and self-generated utility value information. Motivation Science, 1(1), 47–71.

Esmonde, I. (2014). “Nobody’s rich and nobody’s poor … It sounds good, but it’s actually not”: Affluent students learning mathematics and social justice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(3), 348–391.

Fischer, R. (2012). Fächerörientierte Allgemeinbidlung: Entscheidungsfähgikeit und Kommunikationsfähigkeit mit Expertinnen. In R. Fischer, U. Greiner, & H. Bastel (Eds.), Domänen fächerorientierter Allgemeinbildung (pp. 9–17). Trauner.

Gebremichael, A. T., Goodchild, S., & Nygaard, O. (2011). Students’ perceptions about the relevance of mathematics in an ethopian preparatory school. In M. Pytlak, T. Rowland & E. Swoboda (Eds.), Proceedings pf the Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1430–1439). University of Rzeszów.

Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. Taylor & Francis.

Heymann, H. W. (2003). Why Teach Mathematics? Springer.

Kaiser, G., & Maaß, K. (2006). Vorstellungen über Mathematik und ihre Bedeutung für die Behandlung von Realitätsbezügen. In A. Büchter, H. Humenberger, S. Hußmann, & S. Prediger (Eds.), Realitätsnaher Mathematikunterricht vom Fach aus und für die Praxis (pp. 83–94). Franzbecker.

Kislenko, K., Grevholm, B., & Lepik, M. (2007). “Mathematics is important but boring”: Students’ beliefs and attitudes toward mathematics. In C. Bergsten, B. Grevholm, H. S. Måsøval, & F. Rønning (Eds.), Relating practice and research in mathematics education: Proceedings of NORMA 05 (pp. 349–360). Tapir.

Kloosterman, P. (2002). Beliefs about mathematics and mathematics learning in the secondary school: Measurement and implications for motivation. In G. C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 247–292). Kluwer.

Kokka, K. (2020). Social justice pedagogy for whom? Developing privileged students’ critical mathematics consciousness. The Urban Review, 52(4), 778–803.

Kollosche, D. (2017). The ideology of relevance in school mathematics. In A. Chronaki (Ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 633–644). University of Thessaly Press.

Maaß, K., & Ege, P. (2007). Mathematik und Mathematikunterricht aus der Sicht von Hauptschülern. Mathematica Didactica, 30(2), 53–85.

Onion, A. J. (2004). What use is maths to me? A report on the outcomes from student focus groups. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 23(4), 189–194.

Staples, M. (2013) Integrals and equity: A math lesson prompts new awareness for prep school students – and their teacher. In E. Gustein & B. Peterson (Eds.), Rethinking mathematics: Teaching social justice by the numbers (pp. 181–188). Rethinking Schools.

Steflitsch, D., & Deweis-Weidlinger, K. (in press). Critical Mathematics Education in der Wahrnehmung österreichischer Schüler*innen: Ein genauerer Blick auf mathematisch inhaltsspezifische Auswirkungen. In T. Hamann, M. Helmerich, D. Kollosche, K. Lengnink, & S. Pohlkamp (Eds.), Mathematische Bildung neu denken: Andreas Vohns erinnern und weiterdenken. WTM Verlag.

Wright, P. (2020). Transforming mathematics classroom practice through participatory action research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24(2), 155–177.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-27

Issue

No. 27 (2023): Prometeica - nº 27 (07/2023 - 10/2023)

Section

Articles - Dossier 1

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Daniela Steflitsch

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright: Prometeica allows the author (s) to keep their copyrights unrestricted. Prometeica allows the author (s) to retain their publication rights without restriction. Authors should ensure that the article is an original work without fabrication, fraud or plagiarism; does not infringe any copyright or right of ownership of any third party. Authors should also ensure that each one complies with the authorship requirements as recommended by the ICMJE and understand that if the article or part of it is flawed or fraudulent, each author shares responsibility.

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

Prometeica - Journal of Philosophy and Sciences is governed by the licencse CC-By-NC

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

 

Copyright maintenance

Prometeica allows the author (s) to keep their copyright without restrictions.

Prometeica allows the author (s) to retain their publication rights without restriction.

How to Cite

Steflitsch, D. (2023). Experiencing Critical Mathematics Education: Changes in students’ perspectives on the relevance of mathematics. Prometeica - Journal of Philosophy and Science, 27, 252-262. https://doi.org/10.34024/prometeica.2023.27.15291