Theory and process of duets in science

Authors

  • Lucas Rimoldi Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
  • Alicia Monchietti Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34024/prometeica.2023.26.14127

Keywords:

writing, duo, science, epistemology

Abstract

Duet writing in science establishes a “third space” between working and publishing alone and doing it in a group. It reduces isolation, supports motivation and provides confidence to take risks. More influenced by the institutional peculiarities that frame them than other pairs of writers, in the order of their constitution they are distinguished by being composed by researchers from the same or different disciplines. In this joint process, intellectual and material resources are made available, obtained and shared with the primary objective of generating and communicating scientific knowledge, with scientific publication being its main output. We established its phases in the research/writing/correction-publication sequence, which we describe according to a process-type approach. It allows us to highlight the interaction of psychological and sociological, methodological and technical, institutional and ethical factors.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Black, M. (1966). Modelos y metáforas. Tecnos. Madrid.

Bourdieu, P. (2014). Homo academicus. Siglo XXI. Buenos Aires.

Browman, H. y Konstantinos, S. (2008). “Factors and indices are one thing, deciding who is scholarly, why they are scholarly, and the relative value of their scholarship is something else entirely”. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics. 8. 1–3. Disponible en http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/esep00089

Cope, B. y Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Signs of epistemic disruption: Transformations in the knowledge system of the academic journal”. First Monday 14(4). Disponible en http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2309/2163

Creamer, E. (1999). “Knowledge Production, Publication Productivity, and Intimate Academic Partnerships”. The Journal of Higher Education. 70(3). 261-77.

--- (2004). “Collaborators´ Attitudes about Differences of Opinion”. The Journal of Higher Education. 75(5) 556-71.

Duderstadt, J. (2010). Una universidad para el siglo XXI. Universidad de Palermo. Buenos Aires.

Elbrecht, J. y Fakundiny, L. (1994). “Scenes from a Collaboration: Or Becoming Jael B. Juba”. Tulsa Studies in Women´s Literature. 13(2). 241-57.

Hutcheon, L. y Hutcheon, M. (2001). “A Convenience of Marriage: Collaboration and Interdisciplinarity”. PMLA. 116(5). 13-64-76.

Ioannidis, J. (2005). “Why most published research findings are false”. PLoS Medicine 2. 696–701. Disponible en http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

Kraut, R., Egido, C. y Galegher, J. (1988). “Patterns of Contact and Communication in Scientific Research Collaboration”. Proceedings of the 1988 ACM Conference on Computer-supported cooperative work. 149-166.

Lawrence, P. (2008). “Lost in publication: How measurement harms science”. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics. 8. 9–11. Disponible en http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esep/pp6/

Leman, P. (1998). “Social relations, social influence and the development of knowledge”. Papers on Social Representations. 7. 1-2. 41-56.

Mansilla, V., Lamont, M. y Sato, K. (2012). “Successful Interdisciplinary Collaborations”. Proceedings 4S Annual Meeting. Canada.

Monchietti, Alicia, Lombardo, E. (2006) “La historia cognitiva en la vejez. Implicancias clínicas”. Psiquiatría.com. Disponible en http://www.psiquiatria.com/articulos/psicogeriatria/24812 y en Actas VII Congreso Virtual de Psiquiatria, Madrid, ARAN (CD).

Posner, I. y Baecker, R. (1992). “How People Write Together”. Proceedings 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Scienc. IV. 127-38.

Quivy, R. (2005). Manual de investigación en ciencias sociales. Limusa. México. Trad. Luc Van Campenhoudt.

Rimoldi, L., Monchietti, A. (2020). “Dúos de escritores: aspectos técnicos, éticos e identitarios”. Cincinnati Romance Review, 48, pp. 114-127

Silva, G. (2005). “La autoría múltiple y la autoría injustificada en los artículos científicos”. Investigación en salud. 7(2). 84-90.

Steiner, G. (2004). Lecciones de los maestros. Siruela. Madrid.

The Royal Society. (2011). “International collaboration”. Knowledge, networks and nations. Londres. 45-70.

Tomasello, M. (2010). ¿Por qué cooperamos? Katz. Buenos Aires.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-20

Issue

No. 26 (2023): Prometeica - nº 26 (03/2023 - 06/2023)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Lucas Rimoldi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright: Prometeica allows the author (s) to keep their copyrights unrestricted. Prometeica allows the author (s) to retain their publication rights without restriction. Authors should ensure that the article is an original work without fabrication, fraud or plagiarism; does not infringe any copyright or right of ownership of any third party. Authors should also ensure that each one complies with the authorship requirements as recommended by the ICMJE and understand that if the article or part of it is flawed or fraudulent, each author shares responsibility.

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

Prometeica - Journal of Philosophy and Sciences is governed by the licencse CC-By-NC

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

 

Copyright maintenance

Prometeica allows the author (s) to keep their copyright without restrictions.

Prometeica allows the author (s) to retain their publication rights without restriction.

How to Cite

Rimoldi, L., & Monchietti, A. . (2023). Theory and process of duets in science. Prometeica - Journal of Philosophy and Science, 26, 24-34. https://doi.org/10.34024/prometeica.2023.26.14127
Received 2022-07-28
Accepted 2023-03-16
Published 2023-03-20