Aesthetic emotions in fictional contexts

Pragmatic enclave and consequences for action according to Jean Marie Schaeffer

Authors

  • Daniel Scheck Universidad Nacional del Comahue

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34024/prometeica.2021.22.11441

Keywords:

Aesthetic experience, affective dimension, cognition, fictionalization, depragmatization., aesthetic experience, affective dimension, cognition, fictionalization, depragmatization

Abstract

This work is framed in discussions about the status and characteristics of emotions linked to aesthetic experiences in fictional contexts. It offers a reading from the perspective of Jean Marie Schaeffer. She rejects the idea that emotions in fictional contexts are only quasi or pseudo-emotions or simulated or feigned emotions. Likewise, one of the meanings that the term “fictionalize” acquires for that author is questioned. Lastly, the supposed depragmatization of the consequences for an active life that emotions linked to aesthetic experiences would have is discussed.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthethics and Psychobiology. Appleton-Century-Crofts. New York.

Berridge, K. C. (2003). “Pleasures of the Brain”. Brain and Cognition. 52. 106-128.

Burdman, F. (2014). “Mundos imaginarios y cuasiemociones: la solución a la paradoja de la ficción en Walton y Currie”. Cuadernos de filosofía. 61. 63-77.

Currie, G. (1990). The Nature of Fiction. Cambridge University Press. 2008.

Currie, G. (1997). “The Paradox of Caring: Fiction and the Philosophy of Mind”. En M. Hjort & S. Laver (eds.) Emotion and the Arts. Oxford University Press.

Currie, G. (2020). Imagining and Knowing. The shape of fiction. Oxford University Press.

Davies. D. (2005). Fiction, en B. Gaut and D. McIver Lopes (eds.) The Routledge Companion to aesthetics. Routlenge. New York.

García Carpintero, M. (2016). Relatar lo ocurrido como invención. Una introducción a la filosofía de la ficción contemporánea. Cátedra. Madrid.

Gomila, A. (2013). “Emociones en el teatro: ¿por qué nos involucramos emocionalmente con una representación?”. En Soria Tomás, G. (ed.). La representación de las emociones. Dykinson. Madrid. 57-78.

Goodman, N. (1976). Los lenguajes del arte. Traducción de J. Cabanes. Seix Barral. Barcelona.

Levinson, J. (1997). “Emotion in response to art: a survey of the terrain”. En M. Hjort, M. & Laver, S. (eds.). Emotion and the Arts. Oxford University Press.

Radford, C. (1975). “How can we be moved by the fate of Anna Karenina?”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 69. 67-80.

Schaeffer, J.-M. (2005). Adiós a la Estética. Traducción de Javier Hernández. La balsa de la Medusa. Madrid.

Schaeffer, J.-M. (2012). Arte, objetos, ficción, cuerpo. Cuatro ensayos sobre estética. Prólogo. Edición y traducción de Ricardo Ibarlucía. Editorial Biblos. Buenos Aires.

Schaeffer, J.-M. (2013). “Experiencia estética: placer y conocimiento”. Traducción de Ricardo Ibarlucía. Boletín de Estética. 25. 5-34.

Schaeffer, J.-M. (2015). “Aesthetic Relationship, Cognition, and the Pleasures of Art”. En P.F. Bundgaard, F. Stjernfelt (eds.), Investigations Into the Phenomenology and the Ontology of the Work of Art. Springer Open. New York. 145-166.

Schaeffer, J.-M. (2018). La experiencia estética. Traducción de Silvio Mattoni. La Marca. Buenos Aires.

Scheck, D. O. (2020). “Cognición, afectividad y temporalidad: la experiencia estética en Jean-Marie Schaeffer”. Boletín de Estética. 50. 7-30.

Twain, M. (2003). Las aventuras de Tom Sawyer. El Cid Editor. Santa Fe.

Walton, K. (1978). “Fearing Fictions”. Journal of Philosophy. 75: 1. 5-27.

Walton, K. (1990). Mimesis as Make-Believe. Harvard University Press.

Weston, M. (1975). Respuesta a: “How can we be moved by the fate of Anna Karenina?” de C. Radford. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 69. 81-93.

Published

2020-12-22

How to Cite

Scheck, D. (2020). Aesthetic emotions in fictional contexts: Pragmatic enclave and consequences for action according to Jean Marie Schaeffer. Prometeica - Journal of Philosophy and Science, 22, 91-102. https://doi.org/10.34024/prometeica.2021.22.11441
Received 2020-11-27
Accepted 2021-01-02
Published 2020-12-22