The epistemological crisis of Marxian economic theory

Authors

  • Matias Petersen Universidad de los Andes, Chile

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34024/prometeica.2020.20.10021

Keywords:

MacIntyre, traditions of enquiry, Marxian economic theory, epistemological crises

Abstract

In Ethics in the Conflicts of Modernity, MacIntyre argues that neo-Aristotelians have much to learn from Marx’s economic theory, not only for understanding the nature of capitalism, but also for thinking about alternative social and political institutions. This article outlines the arguments given by MacIntyre for embracing Marxian economic theory and argues that if Marxian economics is a tradition of enquiry, in the MacIntyrean sense of the term, we should take seriously the debates within this tradition in order to conclude whether it has been able to withstand internal and external criticism. I argue that Marxian economic theory, as a tradition of enquiry, has been defeated by its opponents and that a synthesis between Aristotelian moral philosophy and Marxian economics is an obstacle to the development of MacIntyre’s political philosophy.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Arrow, K. J. (1951). An Extension of the Basic Theorems of Classical Welfare Economics. Stanford University.

Neyman, J. (2006). (Ed.). Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. (pp. 507–532). University of California Press. Berkeley.

Bator, F. M. (1958). “The anatomy of market failure”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 72(3). 351–379.

Blackledge, P., & Knight, K. (2011a). “Introduction: Towards a Virtuous Politics”. In P. Blackledge & K. Knight (Eds.). Virtue and Politics: Alasdair MacIntyre’s Revolutionary Aristotelianism. (pp. 1–10). University of Notre Dame Press. Notre Dame.

Blackledge, P., & Knight, K. (2011b). Virtue and Politics: Alasdair MacIntyre’s Revolutionary Aristotelianism. University of Notre Dame Press. Notre Dame.

Boettke, P. J. (1997). “Where did economics go wrong? Modern economics as a flight from reality”. Critical Review. 11(1). 11–64.

Bowles, S. (2016). The Moral Economy: Why Good Incentives are No Substitute for Good Citizens. New HavenYale. University Press. London.

Burczak, T. A. (2006). Socialism after Hayek. University of Michigan Press. Ann Arbor.

Burns, T. (2011). “Revolutionary Aristotelianism? The Political Thought of Aristotle, Marx, and MacIntyre”. In P. Blackledge & K. Knight (Eds.). Virtue and Politics. Alasdair MacIntyre’s Revolutionary Aristotelianism. (pp. 35–53). University of Notre Dame Press. Notre Dame, Indiana.

Burns, T. (2017). “Marx, the labour theory of value and the transformation problem”. Capital & Class. 41(3). 493–510.

Campagnolo, G. (2013). “Elements of the reception of Aristotelian thought in 19th century German-language philosophy and economics”. Philosophia, 73(2). 13–36.

Debreu, G. (1959). Theory of Value. An Axiomatic Analysis Of Economic Equilibrium. Yale University Press. New Haven.

Elster, J. (1990). An Introduction to Karl Marx. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Elster, J. (2009). “Excessive ambitions”. Capitalism and Society. 4(2). 1–30.

Gibbard, A. (1998). “Preference and Preferability”. In U. Wessels & C. Fehige (Eds.). Preferences (pp. 239–259). Walter de Gruyter. Berlin.

Gregson, J. (2019). Marxism, Ethics and Politics: The Work of Alasdair MacIntyre. Palgrave Macmillan. Cham, Switzerland.

Hausman, D. M., & McPherson, M. S. (2007). “The Philosophical Foundations of Mainstream Normative Economics”. In D. M. Hausman (Ed.). The Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology (pp. 226–251). Cambridge University Press. New York.

Hilferding, R. (1949). “Böhm-Bawerk’s Criticism of Marx”. In P. Sweezy (Ed.). Karl Marx and the Close of his System. (pp. 119–196). Augustus M. Kelly. New York.

Hobsbawm, E. (1982). “The fortune of Marx’s and Engels’ writings”. In The History of Marxism: Vol. I. Marxism in Marx’s days (pp. 327–344). Indiana University Press. Bloomington.

Hodgson, G. M. (2009). “Institutional Economics into the Twenty-First Century”. Studi E Note Di Economia. 14(1). 3–26.

Howard, M. C., & King, J. E. (1989). A History of Marxian Economics. Princeton University Press. New Jersey.

Kline, G. L. (1988). “The Myth of Marx’s Materialism”. In Sovietica: Vol. 50. Philosophical Sovietology. (pp. 158–203). Springer. Dordrecht.

Kolakowski, L. (1981). Main Currents of Marxism: Its Origins, Growth and Dissolution. Oxford University Press. Oxford.

Lutz, C. S. (2009). Tradition in the Ethics of Alasdair MacIntyre. Lexington Books. Plymouth.

MacIntyre, A. (1977). “Epistemological crises, dramatic narrative and the philosophy of science”. The Monist, 60(4). 453–472.

MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue. A Study in Moral Theory. Bloomsbury. London.

MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Duckworth. London.

MacIntyre, A. (1990). Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry. Encyclopaedia, Genealogy, and Tradition. Duckworth. London.

MacIntyre, A. (1995). Marxism and Christianity. Duckworth. London.

MacIntyre, A. (1998a). “Notes from the Moral Wildernes”. In K. Knight (Ed.). The MacIntyre Reader. (pp. 31–49). Polity Press. Oxford.

MacIntyre, A. (1998b). “Social Science Methodology as the Ideology of Bureaucratic Authority”. In K. Knight (Ed.). The MacIntyre Reader. (pp. 53–68). Polity Press. Cambridge.

MacIntyre, A. (2009). “Intractable Moral Disagreements”. In L. S. Cunningham (Ed.). Intractable Disputes about the Natural Law: Alasdair MacIntyre and Critics. (pp. 1–52). University of Notre Dame Press. Notre Dame, Indiana.

MacIntyre, A. (2011). “Where We Were, Where We Are, Where We Need to Be”. In P. Blackledge & K. Knight (Eds.). Virtue and Politics. Alasdair MacIntyre’s Revolutionary Aristotelianism. (pp. 307–334). University of Notre Dame Press. Notre Dame, Indiana.

MacIntyre, A. (2016a). Ethics in the conflicts of modernity: An essay on desire, practical reasoning, and narrative. Cambridge University Press. New York.

MacIntyre, A. (2016b). “The Irrelevance of Ethics”. In A. Bielskis & K. Knight (Eds.). Virtue and Economy. Essays on Morality and Markets (pp. 7–21). Routledge. London.

Mandel, E. (1990). “Introduction”. In Capital, Volume I (pp. 11–86). Penguin Classics. London.

Marx, K. (1976). Capital, Volume I. Pelican Books. London. (Original work published 1873).

Marx, K. (1981). Capital, Volume III. Pelican Books. London. (Original work published 1885).

McCloskey, D. N. (2010). Bourgeois Dignity. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.

Meikle, S. (1985). Essentialism in the Thought of Karl Marx. Duckworth. London.

Mittermaier, K. (2018). “Menger’s Aristotelianism”. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 42(2), 577–594.

Murphy, M. C. (2003). “Introduction”. In M. C. Murphy (Ed.). Alasdair MacIntyre. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Mühlpfort, W. (1895). “Karl Marx und die Durchschnittsprofitrate”. Jahrbücher Für Nationalökonomie. 65. 92–99.

Niehans, J. (1990). A History of Economic Theory. Classic Contributions, 1720-1980. The Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore.

Porter, J. (2003). “Tradition in the Recent Work of Alasdair MacIntyre”. In M. C. Murphy (Ed.). Alasdair MacIntyre. (pp. 38–69). Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Quaas, F. (1994). “Wolfgang Mühlpfordt and the ‘transformation problem’: Some remarks on articles by Howard and King and Gilbert”. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 18(3). 323–326.

Roemer, J. (Ed.). (1986a). Analytical Marxism. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Roemer, J. (1986b). “Should Marxists be interested in exploitation?” In J. Roemer (Ed.). Analytical Marxism (pp. 260–282). Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Roemer, J. (1988). Free to Lose: An Introduction to Marxist Economic Philosophy. Harvard University Press. Cambridge.

Samuelson, P. A. (1957). “Wages and interest: A modern dissection of Marxian economic models”. The American Economic Review. 47(6). 884–912.

Sankey, H. (1993). “Kuhn’s Changing Concept of Incommensurability”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 44(4). 759–774.

Screpanti, E. (2003). “Value and Exploitation: A counterfactual approach”. Review of Political Economy. 15(2). 155–171.

Screpanti, E., & Zamagni, S. (2005). An Outline of the History of Economic Thought. Oxford University Press. Oxford.

Smith, B. (1990). “Aristotle, Menger, Mises: An Essay in the Metaphysics of Economics”. History of Political Economy. 22 (Annual Supplement). 263–288.

Sombart, W. (1894). “Zur Kritik des Ökonomischen System von Karl Marx”. Archiv Für Sozialgesetzgebung Und Statistik. 7. 555–594.

Tullock, G. (1967). “The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies, and Theft”. Western Economic Journal. 5(3). 224–232.

Downloads

Published

2020-01-21

Issue

No. 20 (2020): Prometeica - nº 20 (02/2020 - 07/2020)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright: Prometeica allows the author (s) to keep their copyrights unrestricted. Prometeica allows the author (s) to retain their publication rights without restriction. Authors should ensure that the article is an original work without fabrication, fraud or plagiarism; does not infringe any copyright or right of ownership of any third party. Authors should also ensure that each one complies with the authorship requirements as recommended by the ICMJE and understand that if the article or part of it is flawed or fraudulent, each author shares responsibility.

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)

Prometeica - Journal of Philosophy and Sciences is governed by the licencse CC-By-NC

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

 

Copyright maintenance

Prometeica allows the author (s) to keep their copyright without restrictions.

Prometeica allows the author (s) to retain their publication rights without restriction.

How to Cite

Petersen, M. (2020). The epistemological crisis of Marxian economic theory. Prometeica - Journal of Philosophy and Science, 20, 18-33. https://doi.org/10.34024/prometeica.2020.20.10021
Received 2019-11-27
Accepted 2020-01-11
Published 2020-01-21