Sobre el valor de la literatura para la enseñanza de la lengua

  • José María Gil Universidad de Mar del Plata
Palabras clave: Filosofía, educación, lengua, lectura, literatura

Resumen

La filosofía sirve, entre muchas otras cosas, para fundamentar los objetivos, las metodologías y las decisiones que se toman en educación. En la primera parte del artículo se muestra cómo actúa esta concepción de la “la filosofía como saber fundacional” en los casos de la incidencia de la tarea para el hogar en el rendimiento académico y de la evaluación de la competencia lectora. La segunda parte del artículo está dedicada a mostrar que el estudio de los textos literarios puede ser el eje organizador para la enseñanza de la lengua porque favorece enormemente el desarrollo de la competencia lectora y de la competencia comunicativa. El análisis de las dos primeras partes da lugar a una serie de conclusiones en virtud de las cuales podría decidirse qué hacer en la enseñanza de la lengua.

Citas

Ananiadou, K. y Claro, M. (2009). 21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries. OECD Education Working Papers. 41. OECD Publishing. París.

Barber, B. (1986). Homework Does Not Belong on the Agenda for Educational Reform. Educational Leadership. May. 55-57.

Bennett, S. y Kalish, N. (2006). The Case Against Homework: How Homework Is Hurting Our Children and What We Can Do About It. Crown. Nueva York.

Biber, D. y Conrad, S. (2019). Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Blazer, C. (2009). Literature review: Homework. Dade County Public Schools. Miami.

Borges, J. L. (1974). Obras Completas, 1923-1974. Emecé. Buenos Aires.

Britt, M. y Rouet, J. (2012). Learning with multiple documents: Component skills and their acquisition. In: Kirby, J. y M. Lawson (eds.), Enhancing the Quality of Learning: Dispositions, Instruction, and Learning Processes. Cambridge University Press. Nueva York.

Britt, M., Goldman, S. y Rouet, J. (eds.) (2013). Reading. From words to multiple texts. Routledge. Nueva York.

Buell, J. (2004). Closing the Book on Homework: Enhancing Public Education and Freeing Family Time. Temple University Press. Philadelphia.

Bunn, J. H. (2017). Balancing the Common Core Curriculum in Middle School Education. Composing Archimedes’ Lever, the Equation, and the Sentence as an Interdisciplinary Unity. Palgrave Macmillan. Nueva York.

Catalano, A. (2015). Collecting for the Curriculum. The Common Core and Beyond. Libraries Unlimited. Santa Bárbara y Denver.

Cazden, C. (2017). Communicative Competence, Classroom Interaction, and Educational Equity. Routledge. Nueva York.

Chang, C. B., Wall, D., Tare, M., Golonka, E., y Vatz, K. (2014). Relations of attitudes toward homework and time spent on homework to course outcomes: The case of foreign language learning. Journal of Educational Psychology. 106. 1049–1065.

Comesaña, M. (2011). Para qué sirve la filosofía. En: J. M. Gil y G. J Gil. Análisis Epistemológico II (11-19). Mar del Plata. Martín.

Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., y Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research. 1987-2003. Review of Educational Research. 76.

Cooper, H., Steenbergen-Hu, S., y Dent, A. L. (2012). Homework. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, Volume 3: Application to learning and teaching. (475-495). American Psychological Association. Washington, DC.

Copi, I. (1995). Introducción a la lógica. Eudeba. Buenos Aires.

Cunningham, A. y Stanovich K. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology. 33 (6). 934-945.

Dehaene, S. (2009). Reading in the Brain. The Science and Evolution of a Human Invention. Viking. New York.

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. Macmillan. Nueva York.

Dudley-Marling, C. (2003) How School Troubles Come Home: The Impact of Homework on Families of Struggling Learners. Current Issues in Education. 6 (4).

Fernández-Alonso, R., Suárez-Álvarez, J. y Muñiz, J. (2015). Adolescents’ Homework Performance in Mathematics and Science: Personal Factors and Teaching Practices. Journal of Educational Psychology. 107 (4). 1075–1085.

Galloway, M. y Pope, J. C. D. (2013). Nonacademic Effects of Homework in Privileged, High-Performing High Schools. The Journal of Experimental Education. 81 (4). 490-510.

Gil, J. M. (2016). A relational account of the Spanish Noun Phrase. Australian Journal of Linguistics. 36 (1). 22-51.

Gil, J. M. (2018). Tensiones productivas del currículo. Dialéctica virtuosa de la educación. Perfiles Educativos. 50 (160). 156-173.

Goodlad, J. L. (1979). Curriculum Inquiry. The Study of Curriculum Practice. Mc Graw-Hill. Nueva York.

Goodlad, J. L. (1984). A place Called School. McGraw-Hill. Nueva York.

Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I. y Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic Representation of Action Words in Human Motor and Premotor Cortex. Neuron. 41. 301-307.

Hinchey, P. (1995). Rethinking Homework. Missouri Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Otoño 1995. 13-17.

Hopkins, T. (1941). Interaction: The Democratic Process. Heath. Boston.

Jakobson, R. (1960). Lingüística y poética. En Ensayos de Lingüística General (347-395). Seix Barral. Barcelona.

Klauda, S. y Guthrie, J. (2015). Comparing relations of motivation, engagement, and achievement among struggling and advanced adolescent readers. Reading and Writing. 28. 239-269.

Kohn, A. (2006). The Homework Myth: Why Our Kids Get Too Much of a Bad Thing. Da Capo. Cambridge.

Kralovec, E. y Buell, J. (2000). The End of Homework: How Homework Disrupts Families, Overburdens Children, and Limits Learning. Beacon Press. Boston.

Lakoff, G. y Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago University Press. Chicago.

Lamb, S. M. (2004). Language and Reality. Continuum. Londres.

Leu, D. (2015). The new literacies of online research and comprehension: Rethinking the reading achievement gap. Reading Research Quarterly. 50 (1). 37–59.

McCrudden, M. y Schraw, G. (2007). Relevance and goal-focusing in text processing, Educational Psychology Review. 19 (2). 113-139.

Mills, P. (1972). A Philosophical Base for Curriculum Decisions, Educational Leadership. 29 (7). 631-637.

Nagel, E. (1968). La estructura de la ciencia. Buenos Aires. Paidós.

Naumann, J. (2015). A model of online reading engagement: Linking engagement, navigation and performance in digital reading. Computers in Human Behavior. 53. 263-277.

OCDE (2006). El programa PISA de la OCDE. Qué es y para qué sirve. OECD Publishing. París.

OCDE (2019). PISA 2018. Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing. París.

Ornstein, A. C. (1991). Philosophy as a Basis for Curriculum Decisions. The High School Journal. 74 (2).102­109.

Perfetti, C. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading. 11 (4). 357-383.

Pinker S. (1994). The language instinct. The New Science of Language and Mind. Harper Collins. New York.

Pomerantz, E. M., Moorman, E. A., y Litwack, S. D. (2007). The how, whom, and why of parents’ involvement in children’s academic lives: More is not always better. Review of Educational Research. 77. 373-410.

Popper, K. R. (1972). Conjeturas y refutaciones. El desarrollo del conocimiento científico. Paidós. Barcelona.

Rayner, K. y Reichle, E. (2010). Models of the Reading Process. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews. Cognitive Science. 1 (6). 787-799.

Richter, T. y D. Rapp (2014). Comprehension and Validation of Text Information: Introduction to the Special Issue. Discourse Processes. 51 (1-2). 1-6.

Ryba, T., Satmbulova, N., Selänne, H.; Aunola, K. y Nurmi, J. E. (2017). Sport has always been first for me, but all my free time is spent doing homework: Dual career styles in late adolescence. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 33. 131-140.

Samway, K. (1986). And You Run and You Run to Catch Up with the Sun, But It’s Sinking. Language Arts.

Schaffner, E., Philipp, M. y Schiefele, E. (2016). Reciprocal Effects Between Intrinsic Reading Motivation and Reading Competence? A Cross-lagged Panel Model for Academic Track and Nonacademic Track Students. Journal of Research in Reading. 39 (1). 19-36.

Schwabe, F., McElvany, N. y Trendtel, M. (2015). The School Age Gender Gap in Reading Achievement: Examining the Influences of Item Format and Intrinsic Reading Motivation. Reading Research Quarterly. 50 (2). 219-232.

Smith, B., Stanley, W. y Shores, J. (1957). Fundamentals of Curriculum Development. Worldbook. N.Y.

Smith, M. (2000). What Will Be the Demands of Literacy in the Workplace in the Next Millennium? Reading Research Quarterly. 35 (3). 378-383.

Stenhouse, L. (1967). Culture and Education. Nelson. Londres.

Tirado, F., Backhoff, E. y Larrazolo, N. (2016). La revolución digital y la evaluación: un nuevo paradigma. Perfiles Educativos. 38 (152). 182-201.

Trautwein, U. (2007). The homework-achievement relation reconsidered: Differentiating homework time, homework frequency, and homework effort. Learning and Instruction. 17. 372-388.

Trautwein, U., y Lüdtke, O. (2009). Predicting homework motivation and homework effort in six school subjects: The role of person and family characteristics, classroom factors, and school track. Learning and Instruction. 19. 243-258.

Trautwein, U., Schnyder, I., Niggli, A., Neumann, M., y Lüdtke, O. (2009). Chameleon effects in homework research: The homework–achievement association depends on the measures used and the level of analysis chosen. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 34. 77- 88.

Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.

Van Dijk, T. (2019). Macrostructures. An Interdisciplinary Study of Global Structures in Discourse, Interaction, and Cognition. Routledge. Londres.

Vatterott, C. (2018). Rethinking Homework. Best Practices That Support Diverse Needs. ASCD. Alexandria.

Waters, H. y Schneider, W. (eds.) (2010). Metacognition, Strategy Use, and Instruction. Guilford. Nueva York.

White, S., J. Chen and B. Forsyth (2010). “Reading-Related Literacy Activities of American Adults: Time Spent, Task Types, and Cognitive Skills Used”. Journal of Literacy Research. 42. 276-307.

Xu, J. (2013). Why do students have difficulties completing homework? The need for homework management. Journal of Education and Training Studies. 1. 98-105.

Publicado
2020-08-18
Cómo citar
Gil, J. M. (2020). Sobre el valor de la literatura para la enseñanza de la lengua. Prometeica - Revista De Filosofía Y Ciencias, (21), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.34024/prometeica.2020.21.9962