The Populist Zeitgeist
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Since the 1980s the rise of so-called ‘populist parties’ has given rise to thousands of books, articles, columns and editorials. This article aims to make a threefold contribution to the current debate on populism in liberal democracies. First, a clear and new definition of populism is presented. Second, the normal-pathology thesis is rejected; instead it is argued that today populist discourse has become mainstream in the politics of western democracies. Indeed, one can even speak of a populist Zeitgeist. Third, it is argued that the explanations of and reactions to the current populist Zeitgeist are seriously flawed and might actually strengthen rather than weaken it.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors will maintain copyright and cede the journal the right to publish, unde license Creative Commons-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Attribution 2.0 Generic.
Authors are responsible for textual content, taking into consideration that the journal uses anti-plagiarism tool and adheres to the ethical guidelines for publication of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the Code of Ethics American Educational Research Association (AERA), the Code of Good Scientific Practice - FAPESP, and the Council of Science Editors (CSE).
For translated articles or those in foreign languages, please contact the responsible editors to avoid conflicts of copyright policy regarding publication.