Interface cérebro-computador
novas perspectivas para a reabilitação
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34024/rnc.2009.v17.8525Palavras-chave:
Interface usuário-computador, Reabilitação, RevisãoResumo
A Interface cérebro-computador (ICC) é uma técnica que utiliza sinais elétricos que podem ser detectados do escalpo, da superfície cortical, ou de áreas subcorticais cerebrais para ativar dispositivos externos tais como computadores, interruptores ou próteses, permitindo que os usuários consigam comunicar-se como o mundo exterior. O objetivo deste estudo foi relacionar conceitos e princípios básicos do ICC destacando alguns dos avanços experimentais mais recentes que podem se tornar aplicações clínicas viáveis no futuro relacionadas à reabilitação de pacientes severamente limitados. Os estudos demonstraram que existem atualmente duas aplicações importantes de um sistema de ICC, a promoção de um novo canal de comunicação e a restauração de funções motoras através da utilização de neuropróteses. Esses estudos apontam o método invasivo como o mais indicado para o controle de neuropróteses. O panorama da restauração de funções motoras tende a crescer bastante nos próximos anos, fato atribuído a grande demanda de questões que ainda permanecem sem resposta e que vem sendo incessantemente investigadas.
Referências
Birbaumer N, Cohen LG. Brain-computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis. J Physiol 2007;579:621-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2006.125633
Wolpaw JR, Birbaumer N, McFarland DJ, Pfurtscheller G, Vaughan TM. Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clin Neurophysiol 2002;113:767-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00057-3
Serruya MD, Hatsopoulos NG, Paninski L, Fellows MR, Donoghue JP. Instant neural control of a movement signal. Nature 2002; 416:141-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/416141a
Taylor DM, Tillery DM, Tillery SI, Schwartz AB. Direct cortical control of 3D neuroprosthetic devices. Science 2002;296:1829-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1070291
Lebedev MA, Carmena JM, O’doherty JE, Zacksenhouse M, Henríquez CS, Príncipe JC, et al. Cortical ensemble adaptation to represent velocity of an artificial actuator controlled by a brain–machine interface. J Neurosci 2005; 2:4681-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4088-04.2005
Bayliss JD, Ballard DH. A virtual reality testbed for brain–computer interface research. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 2000;8:188-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/86.847811
Biran R, Noble MD, Tresco PA. Directed nerve outgrowth is enhanced by engineered glial substrates. Exp Neurol 2003;184:141-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-4886(03)00253-X
Birbaumer N. Brain–computer-interface research: coming of age. Clin Neurophysiology 2006;117:479-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2005.11.002
Birbaumer N, Kubler A, Perelmouter J, Taub E, Flor H. A spelling device for the paralyzed. Nature 1999;398:297-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/18581
Birbaumer N, Kubler A, Ghanayim N, Hinterberger T, Perelmouter J, Kociser J, et al. The thought translation device (TTD) for completely paralyzed patients. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 2000;8:190-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/86.847812
Bossetti CA, Carmena JM, Nicolelis MA, Wolf PD. Transmission latencies in a telemetry linked brain–machine interface. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004;51:919-24.12.Breuer T, Fishlock N. First observation of tool use in wild gorillas. PLOS Biol 2005;3:e380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2004.827090
Brockwell AE, Rojas AL, Kass RE. Recursive Bayesian decoding of motor cortical signals by particle filtering. J Neurophysiol 2004;91:1899-907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00438.2003
Brown EN, Kass RE, Mitra PP. Multiple neural spike train data analysis: state-of-the-art and future challenges. Nat Neurosci 2004;7:456-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1228
Carmena JM, Lebedev MA, Crist RE, O’doherty JE, Santucci DM, Dimitrov DF, et al. Learning to control a brain-machine interface for reaching and grasping by primates. PLOS Biol 2003;1:e42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0000042
Carmena JM, Lebedev MA, Henriquez CS, Nicolelis MA. Stable ensemble performance with single neuron variability during reaching movements in primates. J Neurosci 2005;25:10712-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2772-05.2005
Chapin JK. Neural prosthetic devices for quadriplegia. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2000;13:671-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00019052-200012000-00010
Nicolelis MAL, Birbaumer N, Mueller KL. Special issue on brain machine interfaces. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004;51:877-1087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2004.827677
Chapin JK, Moxon KA, Markowitz RS, Nicolelis MA. Real-time control of a robot arm using simultaneously recorded neurons in the motor cortex. Nat Neurosci 1999;2:664-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/10223
Piccione F, Giorgi F, Tonin P, Priftis K, Giove S, Silvoni S, et al. P300-based brain computer interface: Reliability and performance in healthy and paralysed participants. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:531–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2005.07.024
Sellers EW, Donchin E. A P300-based brain–computer interface: Initial tests by ALS patients. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:538–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2005.06.027
Hinterberger T, Veit R, Wilhelm B, Weiskopf N, Vatine JJ, Birbaumer N. Neuronal mechanisms underlying control of a brain–computer interface. Eur J Neurosci 2005;21:3169-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04092.x
Kubler A, Kotchoubey B, Kaisco J, Wolpaw Jr, Birbaumer N. Brain–computer communication: unlocking the locked in. Psychol Bull 2001;127:358–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.358
Kubler A, Neumann N, Kaiser J, Kotchoubey B, Hinterberg T, Birbaumer N. Brain–computer communication: self regulation of slow cortical potentials for verbal communication. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:1533-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.26621
Obermaier B, Neuper C, Guger C, Pfurtscheller G. Information transfer rate in a five-classes brain–computer interface. IEEE Trans Neural Sys Rehabil Eng 2001;9:283-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/7333.948456
Obermaier B, Muller GR, Pfurtscheller G. Virtual keyboard controlled by spontaneous EEG activity. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2003;11:422-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2003.816866
Sheikh H, Mcfarland DJ, Sarnacki WA, Wolpaw JR. Electroencephalographic (EEG)-based communication: EEG control versus system performance in humans. Neurosci Let 2003;345:89-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00470-1
Wolpaw JR. Brain-computer interfaces (ICCs) for communication and control: a mini-review. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol 2004;57:607-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1567-424X(09)70400-3
Middendorf M, Mcmillan G, Calhoun G, Jones KS. Brain–computer interfaces based on the steady-state visual-evoked response. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 2000;8:211-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/86.847819
Scherberger H, Jarvis MR, Andersen RA. Cortical local field potential encodes movement intentions in the posterior parietal cortex. Neuron 2005;46:347-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.03.004
Schwartz Ab, Taylor Dm, Tillery SI. Extraction algorithms for cortical for cortical control of arm prosthetics. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2001;11:701-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4388(01)00272-0
Guger C, Edlinger G, Harkam W, Niedermayer I, Pfurtscheller G. How many people are able to operate an EEG-based brain-computer interface (ICC). IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2003;11:145-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2003.814481
Kostov A, Polak M. Parallel man-machine training in development of EEG-based cursor control. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 2000;8:203-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/86.847816
Lauer RT, Peckham PH, Kilgore KL. EEG-based control of a hand grasps neuroprosthesis. Neuroreport 1999;10: 1767-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199906030-00026
Hochberg LR, Serruya MD, Friehs GM, Mukand JA, Saleh M, Caplan AH, et al. Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia. Nature 2006;442:164-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04970
Wessber GJ, Stamhaugh CR, Kralik JD, Beck PD, Laubach M, Chapin K, et al. Real-time prediction of hand trajectory by ensembles of cortical neurons in primates. Nature 2000;408:361-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35042582
Serruya M, Hatsopoulos N, Fellows M, Paninski L, Donoghue J. Robustness of neuroprosthetic decoding algorithms. Biol Cybern 2003;88:219-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-002-0374-6
Patil PG, Carmena JM, Nicolelis MA, Turner DA. Ensemble recordings of human subcortical neurons as a source of motor control signals for a brain–machine interface. Neurosurgery 2004;55:1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000126872.23715.E5
Kennedy Pr, Bakay Ra, Moore Mm, Adams K, Goldwaithe J. Direct control of a computer from the human central nervous system. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 2000;8:198-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/86.847815
Shenoy KV, Meeker D, Cao S, Kureshi SA, Pesaran B, Buneo CA, et al. Neural prosthetic control signals from plan activity. Neuroreport 2003;14:591-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200303240-00013
Graimann B, Huggins JE, Schlogl A, Levine SP, Pfurtscheller G. Detection of movement-related desynchronization patterns in ongoing single-channel electrocorticogram. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2003;11:276-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2003.816863
Muller GR, Neuper C, Rupp R, Keinrath C, Gerner HJ, Pfurtscheller G. Event-related beta EEG changes during wrist movements induced by functional electrical stimulation of forearm muscles in man. Neurosci Lett 2003; 340:143-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00019-3
Neuper C, Muller GR, Kubler A, Birbaumer N, Pfurtscheller G. Clinical application of an EEG-based brain-computer interface: a case study in a patient with severe motor impairment. Clin Neurophysiol 2003;114:399-409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00387-5
Pfurtscheller G, Müller GR, Pfurtscheller J, Gerner HJ, Rupp R. ‘Thought’-control of functional electrical stimulation to restore hand grasp in a patient with tetraplegia. Neurosci Lett 2003;351:33-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(03)00947-9
Hatsopoulos N, Joshi J, O’Leary JG. Decoding continuous and discrete motor behaviors using motor and premotor cortical ensembles. J Neurophysiol 2004;92:1165-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01245.2003
Mcfarland DJ, Wolpaw JR. EEG-based communication and control: speed-accuracy relationships. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2003;28:217-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024685214655
Helms Tillery SI, Taylor DM, Schwartz AB. Training in cortical control of neuroprosthetic devices improves signal extraction from small neuronal ensembles. Rev Neuroscienc 2003;14:107-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/REVNEURO.2003.14.1-2.107
Wolpaw J, Mcfarland D. Control of a two-dimensional movement signal by a non-invasive brain–computer interface in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2005;101:17849-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403504101
Isaacs RE, Weber DJ, Schwartz AB. Work toward real-time control of a cortical neural prothesis. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 2000;8:196-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/86.847814
Kennedy PR, Bakay RA. Restoration of neural output from a paralyzed patient by a direct brain connection. NeuroReport 1998;9:1707-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199806010-00007
Fetz EE. Real-time control of a robotic arm by neuronal ensembles. Nat Neurosci 1999;2:583-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/10131
Taylor DM, Tillery SI, Schwartz AB. Information conveyed through brain-control: cursor versus robot. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2003;11:195-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2003.814451
Craelius W. The bionic man: restoring mobility. Science 2002;295:1018-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.295.5557.1018
Paninski L, Fellows MR, Hatsopoulos NG, Donoghue JP. Spatio temporal tuning of motor cortical neurons for hand position and velocity. J. Neurophysiol 2004;91:515-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00587.2002
Karim A, Hinterberger T, Richter J, Melinger J, Neumann N, Flor H, et al. Neuronal internet: web surfing with brain potentials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2006;20:498-503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968306290661
Wolpaw J, Loeb G, Allison B, Donchin E, do Nascimento OF, Heetderks WJ, et al. ICC Meeting 2005 –Workshop on signals and recording methods. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2006;14:138-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2006.875583
Lal TN, Schröder M, Hinterberger T, Weston J, Bogdan M, Birbaumer N, et al. Support vector channel selection in ICC. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004;51:1003-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2004.827827
Leuthardt EC, Schalk G, Wolpaw JR, Ojemann JG, Moran DW. A brain–computer interface using electrocorticographic signals in humans. J Neural Eng 2004;1:63-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/1/2/001
Mehring C, Rickert J, Vaadia E, Cardosa de Oliveira S, Aertsen A, Rotter S. Inference of hand movements from local field potentials in monkey motor cortex. Nat Neurosci 2003;6:1253-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1158
Rickert J, Oliveira SC, Vaadia E, Aertsen A, Rotter S, Mehring C. Encoding of movement direction in different frequency ranges of motor cortical local field potentials. J Neurosci 2005;25:8815-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0816-05.2005
Donoghue JP, Nurmikko A, Black M, Hochberg LR. Assistive technology and robotic control using motor cortex ensemble-based neural interface systems in humans with tetraplegia. J Physiol 2007;579:603-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2006.127209
Dobkin BH. Brain-computer interface technology as a tool to augment plasticity and outcomes for neurological rehabilitation. J Physiol 2007;579:637-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2006.123067
Lebedev MA, Nicolelis MA. Brain-machine interfaces: past, present and future. Trends Neurosci 2006;29:53646.
