Frontotemporal dementia Déficit em Teoria da Mente avaliada com Teste de Happé

Autores

  • Daniel Serrani Médico psiquiatra e geriatra graduado na Universidade Nacional de Rosario, Professor universitário Faculdade de Psicologia da Universidade Nacional de Rosario, Argentina.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34024/rnc.2011.v19.8346

Palavras-chave:

Função Executiva, Teoria da Mente, Demência Frontotemporal, Doença de Alzheimer

Resumo

Objetivo. O objetivo foi avaliar déficit específico na Teoria da Mente comparando-se pacientes com demência frontotemporal e doença de Alzheimer. Método. administraram-se testes neuropsicológicos, de função executiva, escala de depressão de Yesavage e teste de Teoria da Mente utilizando o Teste de Histórias Estranhas de Happé para avaliar capacidade de inferir os estados mentais e interpretar afirmações não literais (metafóricas). Foram avaliados 20 pacientes com demência Alzheimer e 20 pacientes com demência Frontotempral, pareados por idade, sexo, escolaridade e IQ. Os dados foram analisados com teste ANOVA e correlação. Resultados. os pacientes com demência frontotemporal tiveram pior desempenho que os pacientes com doença de Alzheimer no teste de Histórias Estranhas, mas tiveram um desempenho similar na tarefa de controle de eventos físicos. Estes resultados não mostraram uma correlação significante com os testes de função executiva. Ambos grupos tiveram poucas respostas corretas de conteúdo contextual, mas a percentagem foi menor (pior desempenho) para demência frontotemporal. Estes resultados tiveram uma correlação positiva com maior hipometabolismo cerebral nas áreas ventromedial e dorsolateral, demonstrada em imagens de SPECT. Conclusões. os pacientes com Demência têm um déficit específico em Teoria de Mente o que os volta incapazes de construir inferências sobre os estados mentais.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Métricas

Carregando Métricas ...

Referências

Happé F, Loth E. ‘Theory of mind’ and tracking speakers’ intentions. Mind and Language 2002;17:24-36.

Ruby P, Schmidt C, Hogge M, D’Argembeau A, Collette F, Salmon E. Social mind representation: where does it fail in frontotemporal dementia? J Cogn Neurosci 2007;19:671-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.4.671

Eslinger P, Moore P, Troiani V, Antani S, Cross K, Kwok S, et al. Oops! Resolving social dilemmas in frontotemporal dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007;78:457-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2006.098228

Modinos G, Obiols JE, Pousa E, Vicens J. Theory of Mind in Different Dementia Profiles. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2009;21:100-1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.21.1.100

Kipps CM, Nestor PJ, Acosta-Cabronero J, Arnold R and Hodges JR. Understanding social dysfunction in the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia: the role of emotion and sarcasm processing. Brain 2009; 132:592-603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awn314

Happé FGE. An Advanced Test of Theory of Mind: Understanding of Story Characters’ Thoughts and Feelings by Able Autistic, Mentally Handicapped and Normal Children and Adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 1994;24:129-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02172093

Hutchinson AD and Mathias JL. Neuropsychological deficits in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analytic review J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2007;78:917-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2006.100669

Adenzato M, Cavallo M, Enrici I. Theory of mind ability in the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia: An analysis of the neural, cognitive, and social levels, Neuropsychologia 2010;48:2-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.001

Kipps CM, Mioshi E and Hodges JR. Emotion, social functioning and activities of daily living in frontotemporal dementia. Neurocase: The Neural Basis of Cognition 2009;15:182-9.

Wischniewski J, Windmann S, Juckel G, Brune M. Rules of social exchange: Game theory, individual differences and psychopathology, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2009;33:305-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.09.008

Anand R, Hart J, Moore PS, Chapman SB. Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration: Characterizing Semantic Binding and Abstracted Meaning Abilities. Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders 2009;19:117-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/nnsld19.4.117

McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 1984;34:939-44.

Lund and Manchester Groups. Clinical and neuropathological criteria for frontotemporal dementia [review]. J. Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:416-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.57.4.416

Yesavage JA, Brink TL, Rose L, Lum O, Huang V, Adey M, et al. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report. J Psychiatr Res 1983;17:37-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022 3956(82)90033-4

Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6

Torralva T, Roca M, Gleichgerrcht E, Bekinschtein T and Manes F. A neuropsychological battery to detect specific executive and social cognitive impairments in early frontotemporal dementia. Brain 2009;132:1299-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awp041

Weschler D. WAIS-III WMS-III. Technical Manual (Weschler Adult Intelligence Scale & Weschler Memory Scale). Harcourt Brace & Company. 1997. 350 pages Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L, Pasant U, Stuss D, Black S, et al. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria [Review]. Neurology 1998; 51:1546-54.

Rey A. L’examen psychologique dans les cas d’ encephalopathie traumatique. Archives de Psychologie 1941; 28:286-340.

Lansing AE, Ivnik RJ, Cullum CM, Randolph C. An Empirically Derived Short Form of the Boston Naming Test, Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1999;14:481-7.

Howard D y Patterson K. Pyramids and Palm Trees Test: a test of semantic access from pictures and words. Bury St. Edmunds (UK): Thames Valley Test Company, 1992, 16p.

Acevedo A, Loewenstein DA, Barker WW, Harwood DG, Luis C, Bravo M, et al. Category Fluency Test: Normative data for English- and Spanishspeaking elderly. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2000;6:760-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1355617700677032

Tombaugh T, Rees L, McIntyre N. Normative data for the Trail Making Test. In Spreen O, Strauss E (Eds). A compendium of neuropsychological test: administration, norms, and commentary. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998, p.539-42.

Tombaugh T, Kozak J, Rees L. Normative data for the controlled oral word association test. In Spreen O, Strauss E (Eds). A compendium of neuropsychological test: administration, norms, and commentary. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998, p.453-7.

Osmon DC and Suchy Y. Fractionating frontal lobe functions: Factors of the Milwaukee Card Sorting Test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 1996;11:451-552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arclin/11.6.541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0887-6177(95)00048-8

Cummings J, Mega M, Gray K, Rosenberg-Thompson S, Carusi D, Gornbein J. The neuropsychiatric inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology 1994;44:2308-14.

Mitchell JP. Inferences about mental states. Phil Trans R Soc B 2009;364:1309-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0318

Downloads

Publicado

2011-09-30

Como Citar

Serrani, D. (2011). Frontotemporal dementia Déficit em Teoria da Mente avaliada com Teste de Happé. Revista Neurociências, 19(3), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.34024/rnc.2011.v19.8346

Edição

Seção

Artigos Originais
Recebido: 2019-02-24
Publicado: 2011-09-30