Patients with Pusher Syndrome and the Association with Clinical Severity and Functional Dependence

Authors

  • Suzana Palmini Fisioterapeuta, Instrutora do Conceito Bobath – IBITA. Mestre em Ciências da Saúde PUCRRS, Porto Alegre-RS, Brasil.
  • Jaderson Costa Médico, Professor Titular de Neurologia da Faculdade de Medicina e Diretor do Instituto do Cérebro da PUCRS, Porto Alegre-RS, Brasil.
  • Magali Grave Fisioterapeuta, Mestre em Desenvolvimento Regional UNISC; Doutora em Ciências da Saúde PUCRS. Professora dos Cursos de Fisioterapia e Educação Física do Centro Universitário Univates, Lajeado-RS, Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34024/rnc.2013.v21.8205

Keywords:

Stroke, Hemiplegia, Posture, Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective. To establish the prevalence of pusher syndrome (PS) in patients after stroke from clinical criteria contained in Scale for Con­traversive Pushing (CPS - evaluation of the symptom of pushing), and correlate them with neurological abnormalities, severity of stroke and functionality. Method. a cross-sectional study with convenience sample of patients of both sexes with a diagnosis of acute stroke. We included clinically stable patients and that were able to assess the se­verity of the event from the range of National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and BI. To diagnose the pusher syndrome we used two scoring criteria with different cutoff points in the Scale for Contraversive Pushing: result greater than or equal to 1 (criterion I) or greater than zero (criterion II). Results. 86 patients were evaluated. Mean NIHSS and Barthel index were 8.5 and 48,8 points respec­tively. The presence of PS was significantly associated with lower val­ues when the Barthel scale, we used the criterion II (22.5±8.5 versus 58.4±27.3, P<0.001). Conclusion. The prevalence of PS in patients after acute stroke is significant and can vary according to the criteria used. Its presence is associated with clinical severity and functional dependence, higher incidence in ischemic stroke event, parietal lobe and middle cerebral artery, respectively.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Mortality by cause for eight regions of the world: Global burden of disease study. Lancet 1997;349(9061):1269-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07493-4

Donnan GA, Fisher M, Macleod M, Davis SM. “Stroke.” Lancet 2008;371(9624):1612-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60694-7

World Health Organization. Deaths by cause, sex and mortality stratum in WHO regions, estimates for 2002. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004, p.141-149.

Falcão IV, Carvalho EMF, Barreto KML, Lessa FJD, Leite VMM. Acidente Vascular Cerebral Precoce: Implicações para adultos em idade produtiva atendidos pelo sistema único de saúde. Rev. Bras Saúde Matern Infant 2004; 4(1):95-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-38292004000100009

Dobkin B. The economic impact of stroke. Neurology 1995;45(Suppl 1):S6-S9.

Ellekjaer H, Holmen J, Indredavik B, Terent A. Epidemiology of stroke in Innherred, Norway, 1994 to 1996. Incidence and 30 day case fatality rate. Stroke 1997;28:2180-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.28.11.2180

Senelick RC, Rossi PW, Dougherty K. Living with stroke: A guide for families. Chicago: Contemporary books, 1994, p.38-45.

Santos-Pontelli TEG, Pontes Neto O, Araújo DB. Controle postural na síndrome de Pusher: influência dos canais semicirculares laterais. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol 2005;71(4):448-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S003472992005000400008

Beevor C. Remarks on paralysis of movement of the trunk in hemiplegia, and the muscles which are affected . BMJ 1909;1(2519):881-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.2519.881

Davies PM. Steps to follow a guide to the treatment of adult hemiplegia. 2nd. ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2000, p.101-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57022-3

Pedersen PM, Wandel A, Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Ipsilateral Pushing in Stroke: Incidence, Relation to Neuropsychological Symptoms, and Impact on Rehabilitation. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:25-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90215-4

Karnath HO, Ferber S, Dichgans J. The neural representation of postural control in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2000;(25):13931-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.240279997

Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965;14:61-5.

Collin C, Davies S, Horne V. Functional Evaluation: the Barthel Index.”; Md State Med J 1988;14:61-5.

Walter J, Grave MTQ, Perico E. Avaliação das habilidades psicomotoras e motricidade global em paciente portadora da doença de Huntington. ConScientia e Saúde 2009;8(4):655-63.

Adams HP Jr, Davis PH, Leira EC, Chang KC, Bendixen BH, Clarke WR, et al. Baseline NIH Stroke Scale score strongly predicts outcome after stroke: A report of the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST). Neurology 1999;53:126-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.53.1.126

Lyden P, Brott T, Tilley B, Welch KM, Mascha EJ, Levine S, et al. “Improved reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale using video training.” Stroke 1994;25:2220-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.25.11.2220

Martins SCO, Brondani R, Friederich M. Quatro anos de experiência no tratamento trombolítico do AVC isquêmico na cidade de Porto Alegre.Neurociências 2006;14(1):31-6.

Baccini M, Paci M, Nannetti L, Biricolti C, Rinaldi LA. Scale for Contraversive Pushing:Cutoff Scores for Diagnosing “Pusher Behavior” and Construct Validity. Physical Therapy 2008;88(8):947-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20070179

Lagerqvist J, Skargren E. Pusher syndrome: reliability, validity andsensitivity to change of classification instrument. Advances in Physiotherapy 2006;8(4):154-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14038190600806596

Karnath HO, Ferber S, Dichgans J. The origin of contraversive pushing:evidence for a second graviceptive system in humans. Neurology 2000;55:1298-1304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.55.9.1298

Pontes-Neto O, Silva GS, Feitosa MR. Stroke awareness in Brasil: results in a community-based study. Stroke 2008;39:292-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.493908

Gillum RF, Sempos CT. The end of the long-term decline in stroke mortality in the United States? Stroke 1997; 28:1527-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.28.8.1527

Pires SL, Gagliardi JR, Gorzoni LM. Estudo das freqüências dos principais fatores de risco para acidente vascular cerebral isquêmico em idosos. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2004;62(3-B):844-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2004000500020

Perennou DA, Mazibrada G, Chauvineau V, Greenwood R, Rothwell J, Gresty MA, et al. Lateropulsion, pushing and verticality perception in hemisfhere stroke: a causal relationship? Brain 2008 Sep;131(9):2401-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/awn170

Rayerson SD. Reabilitação Neurológica. 4.ed. São Paulo: Manole, 2004, p.73-76.

Ticini, LF, Klose U, Karnath HO. Perfusion imaging in pusher syndrome to investigate the neural substrates involved in controlling upright body position. PloS One 2009;4(5):5737. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005737

Santos-Pontelli TE, Pontes-Neto OM, Colafêmina JF, Araújo DB, Santos AC, Leite JP. Pushing Behavior and Hemiparesis – Which is Critical for Functional Recovery in Pusher Patients? Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2007;65(2-B):5369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2007000300035

Johannsen L, Broetz D, Karnath HO. Pusher syndrome”following cortical lesions that spare the thalamus. J Neurol 2006;253:455-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-005-0025-7

Waddington MM, Ring AB. Syndromes of occlusions of middle cerebral artery branches – angiographic and clinical correlation. Brain 1968;91(4):685-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/brain/91.4.685

Van Nes WJI. Balance recovery after supratentorial stroke – influence of hemineglect and the effects of somatosensory stimulation. Thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen, 2009, p.28-31.

Published

2013-03-31

Issue

Section

Artigos Originais

How to Cite

1.
Palmini S, Costa J, Grave M. Patients with Pusher Syndrome and the Association with Clinical Severity and Functional Dependence. Rev Neurocienc [Internet]. 2013 Mar. 31 [cited 2025 Dec. 20];21(1):69-76. Available from: https://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/neurociencias/article/view/8205