Acquisition and Retention of Ambulation with Long Orthesis in High-Level Myelomeningocele

Authors

  • Aline Martins Isaias Santos Fisioterapeuta, Especialista em Neurofuncional pela Irmandade de Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, Clínica de Mielomeningocele da AACD, São Paulo-SP, Brasil.
  • Érica Costa Barbosa Fisioterapeuta, Aperfeiçoamento em Fisioterapia para reabilitação em deficiência física pela AACD, São Paulo-SP, Brasil.
  • Daniela Logar Pinheiro Fisioterapeuta, Clínica de Mielomeningocele e setor escolar da AACD, São Paulo-SP, Brasil.
  • Karen Abreu Torini Fisioterapeuta, Especialista em Neuropediatria pela Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR), Clínica de Mielomeningocele e Lesão Medular infantil da AACD, São Paulo-SP, Brasil.
  • Ana Laura Chang Fisioterapeuta, Especialista em Neuropediatria pela Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR), Clínica de Mielomeningocele da AACD, São Paulo- -SP, Brasil
  • Adriana Bosquê Justo Fisioterapeuta, Clínica de Mielomeningocele da AACD, São Paulo-SP, Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34024/rnc.2013.v21.8202

Keywords:

Myelomeningocele, Rehabilitation, Ambulation

Abstract

Introduction. The objective of this study was to estimate the mean time for acquisition of ambulation in patients with upper lumbar (UL) myelomeningocele (Mye) using long orthosis (LO); to estimate determinants of persistently using LO. Method. Children from 5 to 17 years of age, with UL Mye, that used LO and received physical therapy for ambulation. Patients were screened by a medical listing, selecting only those with high lumbar level. A questionnaire was ad­ministered on the patient and physical examination. Results. The patients were divided into group 1 (5 to 10 years and 11 months) and group 2 (11 to 16 years and 11 months). The study included 51 patients, 28 from Group 1 and Group 2. Mean time for ambulation using LO was 2.1 years; use of LO was maintained for a mean of 1.9 years after being discharged from physical therapy. Factors positively associated with ambulation were age of training onset and duration of training (p=0.0151 e r2 0.1146), number of surgeries (p=0.074), deformities, overweight and motivation. Conclusion. Earlier onset of training for ambulation and duration of training are associated with increased maintenance of LO use. Use of LO decreases with age (when children seek increased functionality).

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Collange LA, Martins RS, Zanon-Collange N, Santos MTS, Moraes OJS, Franco RC. Avaliação de fatores prognósticos de deambulação em crianças com mielomeningocele. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2006;25:161-165.

Rocco FM, Saito ET, Fernandes AC. Acompanhamento da locomoção de pacientes com mielomeningocele da Associação de Assistência à Criança Deficiente em São Paulo. Acta Fisiatr 2007;14:126-129.

Bruinings AL, Berg-Emons HJG, Buffart LM, Heijden-Maessen HCM, Roebroeck ME, Stam HJ. Energy cost and physical strain of daily activities in adolescents and young adults with myelomeningocele. Dev Med Child Neurol 2007;49:672-677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00672.x

Katz DECO, Haideri NME, Song KMD, Wyrick, PMS. Comparative Study of Conventional Hip-Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthoses Versus Reciprocating- -Gait Orthoses for Children with High-Level Paraparesis. J Pediatr Orthop 1997; 17:377-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004694-199705000-00020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/0124139819970500000020

Cuddeford TJ, Freeling RP, Thomas SS, Aiona MD, Rex D, Sirolli H, et al. Energy consumption in children with myelomeningocele: a comparison between reciprocating gait orthosis and hip-knee-ankle-foot orthosis ambulators. Dev Med Child Neurol 1997;39:239-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07418.x

Gerritsma-Bleeker CLE, Heeg M, Vos-Niel H. Ambulation with the reciprocating- gait orthosis: Experience in 15 children with myelomeningocele or paraplegia. Acta Orthop Scand 1997;68:470-473. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453679708996265

Teulier C, Smith BA, Kubo M, Chang C, Moerchen V, Murazko K, et al. Stepping Responses of Infants With Myelomeningocele When Supported on a Motorized Treadmill. Phys Ther 2009;89:60-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20080120

Mazur JM, Schurtleff D, Colliver J. Orthopaedic management of high- level spina bifida. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989;71:56-61.

Ramos FS, Macedo LK, Scarlato A, Herrera G. Fatores que influenciam o prognóstico deambulatório nos diferentes níveis de lesão da mielomeningocele. Rev Neurocienc 2005;13:80-86.

Bartonek A, Saraste H. Factors influencing ambulation in myelomeningocele: a cross-sectional study. Dev Med Child Neurol 2001;43:253-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2001.tb00199.x

Hoffer MM, Feiwell E, Perry R, Perry J, Bonett C. Functional ambulation in patients with myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973;55:137-148.12.Fernandes, AC, Justo AB, Vasques MLF. Tratamento fisioterapêutico no

defeito do fechamento do tubo neural. In: Hebert S, Xavier R, Pardini AG, Barros TEP. Ortopedia e traumatologia- princípios e prática. 3ª ed. Porto Alegre: ArtMed, 2003, p.858-866.

Norrlin S, Strinnholm M, Carlsson M, Dahl M. Factors of significance for mobility in children with myelomeningocele. Acta Paediatr 2003;92:204-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2003.tb00527.x

Chang CL, Ulrich BD. Lateral stabilization improves walking in people with myelomeningocele. J Biomech 2008; 41:1317-1323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.01.023

Abrantes MM, Lamounier JA, Colosimo EA. Prevalência de sobrepeso e obesidade em crianças e adolescentes das regiões do Sudeste e Nordeste. J pediatr (Rio J.) 2002;78:335-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S002175572002000400014

Schoenmakers MAGC, Uiterewaal CSPM, Gulmans VAM, Gooskens RHJM, Helders PLM. Determinants of functional independence and quality of life in children with spina bifida. Clin Rehabil 2005;19:677-685. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0269215505cr865oa

Williams EM, Broughton NS, Menelaus MB. Age-related walking in children with spina bifida. Dev Med Child Neurol 1999;41:446-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1999.tb00636.x

Bartonek A. Motor Development toward ambulation in preschool children with myelomeningocele - a prospective study. Pediatr Phys Ther 2010;22:52-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181cc132b

Seitzber A, Lind M, Biering-Sorensen F. Ambulation in adults with myelomeningocele. Is it possible to predict the level of ambulation in early life? Child Nerv Syst 2008;24:231-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00381-007-04502

Mazur JM, Kyle S. Efficacy of bracing the lower limbs and ambulation training in children with myelomeningocele. Dev Med Child Neurol 2004;46:352-356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2004.tb00497.x

Williams JJ, Graham GP, Dunne KB, Menelaus MB. Late Knee Problems in Myelomeningocele. J Pediatr Orthop 1993;13:701-703. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01241398-199311000-00001

Buffart LM, Roebroeck ME, Rol M, Stam HJ, Van den Berg- Emons RJG. Triad of physical activity, aerobic fitness and obesity in adolescents and young adults with myelomeningocele. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:70-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0135

Buffart LM, Van den Berg- Emons RJG, Van Meeteren J, Stam HJ, Roebroeck ME. Lifestyle, participation, and health-related quality of life in adolescents and young adults with myelomeningocele. Dev Med Child Neurol 2009;51:886-894. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03293.x

Published

2013-03-31

Issue

Section

Artigos Originais

How to Cite

1.
Santos AMI, Barbosa Érica C, Pinheiro DL, Torini KA, Chang AL, Justo AB. Acquisition and Retention of Ambulation with Long Orthesis in High-Level Myelomeningocele. Rev Neurocienc [Internet]. 2013 Mar. 31 [cited 2025 Dec. 20];21(1):28-35. Available from: https://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/neurociencias/article/view/8202