Deficits in upper limbs after stroke

influences of functional hemispheric asymmetries

Authors

  • Antonio Vinicius Soares Physiotherapist, Master, Center for Research in Neurorehabilitation from the Guilherme Guimbala College, Joinville-SC, Brazil.
  • Noé Gomes Borges Júnior Engineer, PhD, Professor, College of Health and Sport Science, Santa Catarina State University; Florianópolis-SC, Brazil
  • Susana Cristina Domenech Engineer, PhD, Professor, College of Health and Sport Science, Santa Catarina State University; Florianópolis-SC, Brazil.
  • Monique da Silva Gevaerd Loch Pharmaceutical, PhD, Professor, College of Health and Sport Science, Santa Catarina State University; Florianópolis-SC, Brazil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4181/RNC.2015.23.02.992.7p

Keywords:

Stroke, Paresis, Disability Evaluation

Abstract

Objective. To verify whether the functional hemispheric asymmetries exert influence over the deficits on upper limbs of hemiparetic stroke patients. Method. 42 right-handed patients participated in the study, 18 women and 24 men, average age 61.7±10 years, average time le­sion 22±15.1 months. The instruments of measurements: Handgrip Dynamometer, Esthesiometer, Box and Blocks Test, Nine Hole and Peg Test, Barthel Index, Movements Hand Scale and the Modified Ashworth Scale. Results. All tests showed a difference between the paretic and non-paretic sides. Between men and women there was a difference only in the handgrip (p=0.001 paretic side and p<0.000 non paretic side). As hemispheric dominance was different in the pa­retic limb, with the best performance in Box and Blocks Test on the dominant side (p=0.016). Conclusion: In hemiparetic patients the contralateral alterations are global and more severe, and the ipsilateral are related to the manual dexterity. The evaluation and the rehabilita­tion planning of these patients have to consider global approaches and not only limited to the contralateral deficits.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Lotufo PA. Stroke in Brazil: a neglected disease. São Paulo Med J 2005;123:3- 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-31802005000100001

Kwakkel G, Van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, Dauphinee SW, Richards C, Ashburn A, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after Stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2004;35:2529-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000143153.76460.7d

Teixeira-Salmela LF, Oliveira ESG, Santana EGS, Resende GP. Fortalecimento muscular e condicionamento físico em hemiplégicos. Acta Fisiatr 2000;7:108-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0104-7795.20000001

Cabral NL, Gonçalves ARR, Longo AL, Moro CH, Costa G, Amaral C, et al. Trends in stroke incidence, mortality and case fatality rates in Joinville, Brazil: 1995-2006. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009;80:749-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2008.164475

Chestnut C, Haaland KW. Functional significance of ipsilesional motor deficits after unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:62-8.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.125

Noskin O, Krakauer JW, Lazar RM, Festa JR, Handy C, O’Brien KA, et al. Ipsilateral motor dysfunction from unilateral stroke: implications for the functional neuroanatomy of hemiparesis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79:401-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2007.118463

Nowak DA, Grefkes C, Dafotakis M, Ku J, Karbe H, Fink GR. Dexterity is impaired at both hands following unilateral subcortical middle cerebral artery stroke. Eur J Neurosci 2007;25:3173-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460- 9568.2007.05551.x

Wetter S, Poole JL, Haaland KY. Functional implications of ipsilesional motor deficits after unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:776-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.08.009

Sunderland A. Recovery of ipsilateral dexterity after stroke. Stroke 2000;31:430-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.31.2.430

Sunderland A, Bowers MP, Sluman SM, Wilcock DJ, Ardron ME. Impaired dexterity of the ipsilateral hand after stroke and the relationship to cognitive deficit. Stroke 1999;30:949-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.5.949

Figueiredo IM, Sampaio RF, Mancini MC, Silva FCM, Souza MAP. Teste de força de preensão utilizando o dinamômetro Jamar. Acta Fisiatr 2007;14;104- 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0104-7795.20070002

Fess EE, Moran CA. Clinical assessment recommendation. Indianapolis: American Society of Hand Therapists, 1981.

Soares AV, Kerscher C, Uhlig L, Domenech SC, Borges-Junior NG. Escala de movimentos da mão: um instrumento preditivo da recuperação funcional do membro superior de pacientes hemiparéticos por acidente vascular cerebral. Arq Cat Med 2011;40:47-51.

Katrak P, Bowring G, Conroy P, Chilvers M, Poulos R, McNeil D. Predicting upper limb recovery after stroke: the place of early shoulder and hand movement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:758-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90352-5

Huter-Becker A, Dolken M. Fisioterapia em neurologia. São Paulo: Santos, 2008, p.98-110.

Gregson JM, Leathley M, Moore P, Sharma AK, Smith TL, Watkins CL.Reliability of the tone assessment scale and the Modified Ashworth Scale as clinical tools for assessing post-Stroke spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:1013-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90053-9

Faria I. Função do membro superior em hemiparéticos crônicos: análise através da classificação internacional de funcionalidade, incapacidade e saúde (Dissertação). Belo Horizonte: Escola de Educação Física, Fisioterapia e Terapia Ocupacional – Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 2008, 114 p.

Mendes MF, Tilbery CP, Balsimelli S, Moreira MA, Cruz AMB. Teste de destreza manual da caixa e blocos em indivíduos normais e em pacientes com esclerose múltipla. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2001;59:889-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2001000600010

Lundy-Ekman L. Neurociências fundamentos para reabilitação. 3 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2008, 111p.

Moreira D, Alvarez RRA. Utilização dos monofilamentos de Semmes- -Weisntein na avaliação de sensibilidade dos membros superiores de pacientes hansenianos atendidos no Distrito Federal. Hansenol Inter 1999;24:121-8.

Araújo F, Ribeiro JLP, Oliveira A, Pinto C. Validação do índice de Barthel numa amostra de idosos não institucionalizados. Rev Port Saúde Pub 2007;25:59-66.

Poole JL, Sadek J, Haaland KY. Ipsilateral deficits in 1-handed shoe tying after left or right hemisphere stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:1800-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.03.01923. Rinehart JK, Singleton RD, Adair JC, Sadek JR, Haaland KY. Arm use after left or right hemiparesis is influenced by hand preference. Stroke 2009;40:545-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.528497

Harris JE, Eng JJ. Paretic upper-limb strength best explains arm activity in people with stroke. Phys Ther 2007;87:88-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20060065

Jankowska E, Edgley SA. How can corticospinal tract neurons contribute to ipsilateral movements? A question with implications for recovery of motor functions. Neuroscientist 2006;12:67-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073858405283392

Thompson-Butel AG, Lin GG, Shiner CT, McNulty PA. Two common tests of dexterity can stratify upper limb motor function after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2014;1:1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1545968314523678

Beebe JA, Lang CE. Relationships and responsiveness of six upper extremity function tests during the first six months of recovery after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther 2009;33:96-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181a33638

D’Oliveira GDF. Avaliação funcional da força de preensão palmar com dinamômetro Jamar®: estudo transversal de base populacional (Dissertação). Brasília: Curso de Educação Física, Universidade Católica de Brasília, 2005, 74p.

Nicolay CW, Walker AL. Grip strength and endurance: Influences of anthropometric variation, hand dominance, and gender. Intern J Industr Ergonom 2005;35:605-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2005.01.007

Published

2015-06-30

Issue

Section

Artigos Originais

How to Cite

1.
Soares AV, Borges Júnior NG, Domenech SC, Loch M da SG. Deficits in upper limbs after stroke: influences of functional hemispheric asymmetries. Rev Neurocienc [Internet]. 2015 Jun. 30 [cited 2025 Dec. 14];23(2):260-6. Available from: https://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/neurociencias/article/view/8031