Incidence of spina bifida in Santa Catarina (2013-2022): ecological study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34024/rnc.2025.v33.20482

Keywords:

Spina Bifida, Spinal Dysraphism, Myelomeningocele, Brazil

Abstract

Introduction. Neural tube defects (NTDs) are congenital anomalies affecting the central nervous system in early embryonic weeks, with spina bifida being a common manifestation, presenting neurological, orthopedic, and urological symptoms. Genetic and environmental factors contribute to these anomalies. Improved prenatal diagnosis and a multidisciplinary approach from gestation are crucial to minimizing complications. Method. This ecological study analyzed spina bifida cases in all children born in Santa Catarina between 2013 and 2022, using DataSUS data. Information about the population and statistical tools studied was provided. Results. In Santa Catarina, there were 223 spina bifida cases (23.13 per 100,000 inhabitants). The most affected cities were Joinville, Florianópolis, and São José. Incidence was higher among males, with the highest prevalence in pregnant women aged 25 to 29. Most newborns had high Apgar scores and weights between 3000–3999 grams. Blumenau recorded 41 deaths, the highest number. No significant gender differences were found. The decline in spina bifida cases may be linked to folic acid fortification. The predominance of males and the white demographic, along with incidence among younger pregnant women, highlight sociodemographic and healthcare access issues. High Apgar scores underscore the importance of early evaluation, while mortality rates emphasize the need for continuous monitoring to reduce morbidity and mortality. Conclusions. The study reiterates the importance of health policies and clinical practices to reduce spina bifida incidence and improve the quality of life of affected patients.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

  • Jucélia Jeremias Fortunato

    Corresponding Author. Graduated in Biological Sciences (UNESC), Master in Environmental Sciences (UNESC), PhD in Biochemistry (UFRGS). Full Professor of Medicine at UNISUL and member of the Structuring Teaching Core.

  • Kelser De Souza Kock

    Licenciado en Fisioterapia (UDESC), en Física (UFSC), especialista en Fisiología del Ejercicio (UNESC), Terapia Intensiva (ASSOBRAFIR) e Informática en Salud (UNIFESP). Máster en Ciencias de la Salud (UNISUL), doctor en Ciencias Médicas (UFSC). Profesor titular de los cursos de Fisioterapia, Medicina y Matemáticas en la UNISUL.

  • Chaiana Esmeraldino Mendes Marcon

    Enfermera (UNISUL), especialista en Enfermería Médico-Quirúrgica (UNISUL), Salud de la Familia (UFSC) y Enseñanza Digital (São Leopoldo Mandic). Docente en Medicina y Salud en la UNISUL y enfermera en la Fundación Municipal de Salud de Tubarão.

  • Guilherme Xavier Wensing

    Estudiante de Medicina en la UNISUL

  • Pedro Miguel Ghizoni Pereira

    Estudiante de Medicina en la UNISUL.

  • Thamara Vieira Bitencourt

    Estudiante de Medicina en la UNISUL

References

1.Schindelmann KH, Paschereit F, Steege A, Stoltenburg-Didinger G, Kaindl AM. Systematic classification of spina bifida. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2021;80:294-305. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/nlab007

2.Copp AJ, Adzick NS, Chitty LS, Fletcher JM, Holmbeck GN, Shaw GM. Spina bifida. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2015;1:15007. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.7

3.Bronzeri FG, Faria TS, Silva FS, Coimbra PC, Frangella VS. Mielomeningocele e nutrição: proposta de protocolo de atendimento. Mundo Saúde 2011;35:215-24. https://doi.org/10.15343/0104-7809.20112215224

4.Protzenko T, Bellas A, Pousa MS, Protzenko M, Fontes JM, Silveira AML, et al. Reviewing the prognostic factors in myelomeningocele. Neurosurg Focus 2019;47:E2. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.7.FOCUS19462

5.Hassan AE, Du YL, Lee SY, Wang A, Farmer DL. Spina bifida: a review of the genetics, pathophysiology and emerging cellular therapies. J Dev Biol 2022;10:22. https://doi.org/10.3390/jdb10020022

6.Vieira RS, Diogo CMS, Vieira CLJ, Silva JS, Nascimento JC, Tavares MM. Cuidados de Enfermagem prestados à criança portadora de mielomeningocele e suas complicações. Rev Pró Univer SUS 2021;12:94-101. https://doi.org/10.21727/rpu.v12i2.2712

7.Pereira-Mata R, Franco A, Gago C, Pacheco A. Diagnóstico pré-natal de defeitos do tubo neural. Acta Obstet Ginecol Port 2018;12:144-35. https://scielo.pt/pdf/aogp/v12n2/v12n2a07.pdf

8.Christianson A, Howson CP, Modell B. March of Dimes global report on birth defects: the hidden toll of dying and disabled children. White Plains: March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation; 2006.

9.Campos JR, Souto JV, Machado LC. Estudo epidemiológico de nascidos vivos com Espinha Bífida no Brasil. Braz J Health Rev 2021;4:9693-700. https://doi.org/10.34119/bjhrv4n3-008

10.Mariani Neto C. Prevenção dos defeitos abertos do tubo neural – DTN. 2ª ed. São Paulo: FEBRASGO; 2020.

11.Bizzi JWJ, Machado A. Mielomeningocele: conceitos básicos e avanços recentes. J Bras Neurocir 2012;23:138-51. https://doi.org/10.22290/jbnc.v23i2.1161

12.Almeida MC, Veloso ML, Camilo JC, Spósito TS, Pacheco LG, Pacheco GG, et al. Condutas terapêuticas para mielomeningocele. Res Soc Dev 2022;11:e34711628983. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i6.28983

13.Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA). Relatório do Monitoramento da Fortificação de Farinhas de Trigo e Milho com Ferro e Ácido Fólico (2020 e 2021). Brasília: ANVISA; 2022. https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/centraisdeconteudo/publicacoes/monitoramento/programas-nacionais-de-monitoramento-de-alimentos/RelatriodeFortificaodeFarinhasdeTrigoeMilhocomFerroecidoFlicop.pdf

14.Fujimori E, Baldino CF, Sato APS, Borges ALV, Gomes MN. Prevalência e distribuição espacial de defeitos do tubo neural no Estado de São Paulo, Brasil, antes e após a fortificação de farinhas com ácido fólico. Cad Saúde Pública 2013;29:145-54. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2013000500017

15.Programa de Qualificação de Operadoras ano-base 2022. Brasília: Diretoria de Desenvolvimento Setorial; 2022. https://www.gov.br/ans/pt-br/assuntos/informacoes-e-avaliacoes-de-operadoras/1.2.TaxadeConsultasdePrNatal.pdf

16.Fernandes FCGM, Santos EGO, Barbosa IR. Age of first pregnancy in Brazil: data from the national health survey. J Hum Growth Dev 2019;29:304-12. https://doi.org/10.7322/jhgd.v29.9523

17.Estadão. Brasileiras estão tendo menos filhos, com exceção das mulheres de 40 a 49 anos; entenda os motivos (internet). São Paulo: Estadão; 2023. Disponível em: https://www.estadao.com.br/brasil/brasileiras-estao-tendo-menos-filhos-com-excecao-das-mulheres-de-40-a-49-anos-entenda-os-motivos/

18.Schardosim JM, Rodrigues NLDA, Rattner D. Parâmetros utilizados na avaliação de bem-estar do bebê no nascimento. Avances Enferm 2018;36:187-208. https://doi.org/10.15446/av.enferm.v36n2.67809

19.Figueiredo LSS, Andrade TOLA, Abreu Neto AV, Melo BG, Cruz IS. Perfil epidemiológico de mortalidade por espinha bífida. Rev Soc Bras Clin Med 2019;17:171-3. https://www.sbcm.org.br/ojs3/index.php/rsbcm/article/view/712

Published

2025-08-20

Issue

Section

Artigos Originais

How to Cite

1.
Jeremias Fortunato J, De Souza Kock K, Esmeraldino Mendes Marcon C, Xavier Wensing G, Ghizoni Pereira PM, Vieira Bitencourt T. Incidence of spina bifida in Santa Catarina (2013-2022): ecological study. Rev Neurocienc [Internet]. 2025 Aug. 20 [cited 2025 Dec. 19];33:1-15. Available from: https://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/neurociencias/article/view/20482