Artificial intelligence in outcome prediction and neurosurgical planning

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34024/rnc.2025.v33.19739

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Neurosurgery, Machine Learning, Planning

Abstract

Introduction. The metastasis of solid tumors is common in neurosurgery, and its treatment faces challenges such as radioresistance and difficulty accessing central areas of the brain. Advanced technologies, especially those involving machine learning, have improved diagnostic and predictive accuracy in neurosurgery; however, gaps remain in the literature regarding their application. Objective. This review aims to analyze the potential of machine learning (ML) techniques in neurosurgical processes. Method. Data were collected from the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases using the descriptors Brain Neoplasm, Brain Tumor, Machine Learning, and Neurosurgical Procedure. Results. Recent ML models demonstrated high accuracy in predicting therapeutic responses and metastasis progression, surpassing traditional methods, especially when integrated with clinical and radiomic data. Automated tools have also advanced tumor segmentation, though improvements are still needed for detecting small lesions. ML has stood out in longitudinal monitoring, optimizing volumetric analyses and clinical decision-making. In surgical navigation, accelerates tumor dissection and enhances tumor identification, showing great potential to personalize treatments accurately and individually. Conclusion. Exploring the applications of ML techniques in neurosurgery, focusing on brain tumor treatment, has revealed a promising outlook on how ML can transform the field of neuroscience, from planning to executing surgical interventions.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Thon N, Karschnia P, Baumgarten LV, Niyazi M, Steinbach JP, Tonn JC. Neurosurgical interventions for cerebral metastases of solid tumors. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2023;120:162-9. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0410

Galicich J. Surgery of malignant brain tumors. Semin Neurol 1981;1:159-68. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1063894

Boaro A, Azzari A, Basaldella F, Nunes S, Feletti A, Bicego M, et al. Machine learning allows expert level classification of intraoperative motor evoked potentials during neurosurgical procedures. Comput Biol Med 2024;180:109032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109032

Rezai AR. The Evolution of Technology and Neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 2014;61:66-8. https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000000419

Rennert RC, Santiago-Dieppa DR, Figueroa J, Sanai N, Carter BS. Future directions of operative neuro-oncology. J Neuro Oncol 2016;130:377-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-016-2180-3

Deo RC. Machine Learning in Medicine. Circulation 2015;132:1920-30. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.115.001593

Choi RY, Coyner AS, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Chiang MF, Campbell JP. Introduction to Machine Learning, Neural Networks, and Deep Learning. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2020;9:14. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.2.14

Buchlak QD, Esmaili N, Leveque JC, Farrokhi F, Bennett C, Piccardi M, et al. Machine learning applications to clinical decision support in neurosurgery: an artificial intelligence augmented systematic review. Neurosurgical Ver 2019;43:1235-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-019-01163-8

Zhao J, Vaios E, Wang Y, Yang Z, Cui Y, Reitman ZJ, et al. Dose-Incorporated deep ensemble learning for improving brain metastasis SRS outcome prediction. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024;120:603-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.04.006

Lee W, Hong J, Lin Y, Lu Y, Hsu Y, Lee C, et al. Federated learning: a cross‐institutional feasibility study of deep learning based intracranial tumor delineation framework for stereotactic radiosurgery. J Magn Reson Imaging 2023;59:1967-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.28950

Cho SJ, Cho W, Choi D, Sim G, Jeong SY, Baik SH, et al. Prediction of treatment response after stereotactic radiosurgery of brain metastasis using deep learning and radiomics on longitudinal MRI data. Sci Rep 2024;14:11085. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60781-5

Jeong H, Park JE, Kim N, Yoon SK, Kim HS. Deep learning-based detection and quantification of brain metastases on black-blood imaging can provide treatment suggestions: a clinical cohort study. Eur Radiol 2023;34:2062-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10120-5

Hammer Y, Najjar W, Kahanov L, Joskowicz L, Shoshan Y. Two is better than one: longitudinal detection and volumetric evaluation of brain metastases after Stereotactic Radiosurgery with a deep learning pipeline. J Neuro Oncol 2024;166:547-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04580-y

Du P, Liu X, Xiang R, Lv K, Chen H, Liu W, et al. Development and validation of a radiomics-based prediction pipeline for the response to stereotactic radiosurgery therapy in brain metastases. Eur Radiol 2023;33:8925-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09930-4

DeVries DA, Tang T, Albweady A, Leung A, Laba J, Johnson C, et al. Predicting stereotactic radiosurgery outcomes with multi-observer qualitative appearance labelling versus MRI radiomics. Sci Rep 2023;13:20977. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47702-8

Shimamoto T, Sano Y, Yoshimitsu K, Masamune K, Muragaki Y. Precise brain-shift prediction by new combination of w-net deep learning for neurosurgical navigation. Neurol Med Chir 2023;63:295-303. https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2022-0350

Wang JY, Qu V, Hui C, Sandhu N, Mendoza MG, Panjwani N, et al. Stratified assessment of an FDA-cleared deep learning algorithm for automated detection and contouring of metastatic brain tumors in stereotactic radiosurgery. Radiat Oncol 2023;18:61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-023-02246-z

DeVries DA, Lagerwaard F, Zindler J, Yeung TP, Rodrigues G, Hajdok G, et al. Performance sensitivity analysis of brain metastasis stereotactic radiosurgery outcome prediction using MRI radiomics. Sci Rep 2022;12:20975. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25389-7

Chao PJ, Chang L, Kang CL, Lin CH, Shieh CS, Wu JM, et al. Using deep learning models to analyze the cerebral edema complication caused by radiotherapy in patients with intracranial tumor. Sci Rep 2022;12:1555. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-05455-w

Yang Z, Chen M, Kazemimoghadam M, Ma L, Stojadinovic S, Timmerman R, et al. Deep-learning and radiomics ensemble classifier for false positive reduction in brain metastases segmentation. Phys Med Amp Biol 2022;67:025004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ac4667

Jaberipour M, Soliman H, Sahgal A, Sadeghi-Naini A. A priori prediction of local failure in brain metastasis after hypo-fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy using quantitative MRI and machine learning. Sci Rep 2021;11:21620. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01024-9

Fang Y, Wang H, Feng M, Zhang W, Cao L, Ding C, et al. Machine-Learning prediction of postoperative pituitary hormonal outcomes in nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: a multicenter study. Front Endocrinol 2021;12:748725. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.748725

Zhou Z, Sanders JW, Johnson JM, Gule-Monroe MK, Chen MM, Briere TM, et al. Computer-aided detection of brain metastases in t1-weighted MRI for stereotactic radiosurgery using deep learning single-shot detectors. Radiology 2020;295:407-15. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020191479

Zhu E, Shi W, Chen Z, Wang J, Ai P, Wang X, et al. Reasoning and causal inference regarding surgical options for patients with low‐grade gliomas using machine learning: A SEER‐based study. Cancer Med 2023;12:20878-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6666

Touati R, Kadoury S. A least square generative network based on invariant contrastive feature pair learning for multimodal MR image synthesis. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2023;18:971-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-023-02916-z

Cardone D, Trevisi G, Perpetuini D, Filippini C, Merla A, Mangiola A. Intraoperative thermal infrared imaging in neurosurgery: machine learning approaches for advanced segmentation of tumors. Phys Eng Sci Med 2023;46:325-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-023-01222-x

Doyen S, Nicholas P, Poologaindran A, Crawford L, Young IM, Romero‐Garcia R, et al. Connectivity‐based parcellation of normal and anatomically distorted human cerebral cortex. Hum Brain Mapp 2021;43:1358-69. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25728

Fabelo H, Halicek M, Ortega S, Shahedi M, Szolna A, Piñeiro J, et al. Deep learning-based framework for in vivo identification of glioblastoma tumor using hyperspectral images of human brain. Sensors 2019;19:920. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19040920

Tariciotti L, Caccavella VM, Fiore G, Schisano L, Carrabba G, Borsa S, et al. A deep learning model for preoperative differentiation of glioblastoma, brain metastasis and primary central nervous system lymphoma: a pilot study. Front Oncol 2022;12:816638. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.816638

Bouget D, Eijgelaar RS, Pedersen A, Kommers I, Ardon H, Barkhof F, et al. Glioblastoma surgery imaging–reporting and data system: validation and performance of the automated segmentation task. Cancers 2021;13:4674. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13184674

Published

2025-03-25

Issue

Section

Artigos de Revisão

How to Cite

1.
Lima Guimarães W, Beirigo Barbosa AP, Miranda Cruz GA, Ferreira Godoi MK, Mota Mendes MC, Rassi Filho S, et al. Artificial intelligence in outcome prediction and neurosurgical planning. Rev Neurocienc [Internet]. 2025 Mar. 25 [cited 2025 Dec. 14];33:1-20. Available from: https://periodicos.unifesp.br/index.php/neurociencias/article/view/19739
Received 2024-11-22
Accepted 2025-03-12
Published 2025-03-25