ICF domains in motor development assessment tools: an integrative review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34024/rnc.2023.v31.14605Keywords:
Child Development, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, Health EvaluationAbstract
Introduction. Motor development is also influenced by the context the child is inserted. The health service follows up children for developmental screening, using different assessment instruments. Through the creation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), a new approach based on the biopsychosocial model was brought, which made possible the evaluation focusing on functional and/or disabling aspects. Objective. To identify the presence of ICF components in motor development assessment instruments validated for Brazilian children. Method. This is an integrative review carried out in PubMed, CINAHL, and, Embase (Elsevier) databases, using descriptors “functioning” and “motor development” combined with their synonyms, including only observational cohort and cross-sectional studies published in Portuguese, English, or Spanish with individuals in early childhood, without temporal demarcation. The instruments in the studies were collected, and only those with validation in Brazil were registered. These instruments underwent an analysis that related their concepts to the components contained in the ICF through descriptive statistics with the presentation of absolute frequency (n) and relative frequency (%). Results. After the eligibility of the studies and instruments found, seven were validated in Brazil and available for access. The process of extracting concepts from the ICF generated concepts divided into the following components: Body Functions (22.6%), Activities and Participation (75.2%), and Not Covered (2.2%). Conclusions. Few instruments intended for the evaluation of early childhood motor development are validated for Brazil, and none of the instruments addressed all the components proposed by the ICF, being necessary to complement them with other tools.
Metrics
References
Mélo TR, De Araújo LB, Novakóski KRM, Israel VL . Sistematização de instrumentos de avaliação para os dois primeiros anos de vida de bebês típicos ou em risco conforme o modelo da CIF. Rev Fisioter Pesqui 2019;26:380-93. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/18026126042019
Cardoso KVV, Lima SA. Intervenção psicomotora no desenvolvimento infantil: uma revisão integrativa. Rev Bras Promoç Saúde 2019;32:9300. https://doi.org/10.5020/18061230.2019.9300
Rebelo M, Serrano J, Duarte-Mendes P, Paulo R, Marinho DA. Desarrollo Motor del niño: Relación entre Habilidades Motoras Globales, Habilidades Motoras Finas y Edad. Cuad Psicol Deporte 2020;20:75-85. https://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/cpd/v20n1/1578-8423-cpd-20-1-75.pdf
Strooband KF, Rosnay M, Okely AD. Prevalence and risk factors of pre‐schoolers' fine motor delay within vulnerable Australian communities. J Paed Child Health 2021;57:114-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.15152
Dos Santos RS, de Lima Barreto AOO, da Silva MCCPB, Sa Nogueira HOV, Peres RT, Ribeiro MG, et al. Agreement Between Alberta Infant Motor Scale Assessment and Maternal Perception of Motor Development in Full-Term Infants. Develop Neurorehab 2022;25:417-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2022.2052373
Brian A, Pennell A, Taunton S, Starrett A, Howard-Shaughnessy C, Goodway JD, et al. Motor competence levels and developmental delay in early childhood: A multicenter cross-sectional study conducted in the USA. Sports Med 2019;49:1609-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-019-01150-5
Santos LRVD, Ferracioli MDC. Prevalence of children identified with motor difficulties. Cad Bras Terap Ocupac 2020;28:525-38. https://doi.org/10.4322/2526-8910.ctoAO1847
Hagan J, Shaw JS, Duncan PM. Bright futures: Guidelines for health supervision of infants, children, and adolescents. 4th ed. Elk Grove Village:American Academy of Pediatrics; 2017.
Silva CA, Dalbello-Araujo M. Programa de Residência Multiprofissional em Saúde: o que mostram as publicações. Saúde Debate 2019;43:1240-58. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-1104201912320
Engel G. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977;196:129-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-409-95009-0.50006-1
OMS – Organização Mundial da Saúde. CIF: Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde (Internet address). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001 (acessed in 2022/09/13). Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/42407/9788531407840_por.pdf?sequence=111
Barreto MCA, Andrade FG, Castaneda L, Castro SS. A Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde (CIF) como dicionário unificador de termos. Acta Fisiatr 2021;28:207-21. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-0190.v28i3a18848.gn
Souza LM, Sousa FC. A classificação internacional de funcionalidade, incapacidade e saúde: evolução das publicações brasileiras. Rev Saúde Dinâmica 2020;2:42-74. http://revista.faculdadedinamica.com.br/index.php/saudedinamica/article/view/42
Bronfenbrenner U, Ceci SJ. Nature-nuture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychol Rev 1994;101:568-86. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.568
De Barros RS, De Souza KM, Paiva GS, Da Silva EG, Da Silva DC, Mello CMS, et al. Principais instrumentos para avaliação do desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor em crianças no Brasil. Braz J Develop 2020;6:60393-406. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv6n8-451
Biz MCP, Chun RYS. Operacionalização da Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde, CIF, em um centro especializado em reabilitação. CoDAS 2020;32:e20190046. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20192019046
Souza MT, Silva MD, Carvalho R. Revisão integrativa: o que é e como fazer. Rev Einstein 2010;8:102-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-45082010rw1134
Izidoro IR, Jorcuvich DI, Pereira VA, Rodrigues OMPR. Serviços especializados em intervenção precoce: elegibilidade e atuação multiprofissional. Rev CEFAC 2019;21:e4919. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/20192144919
Cieza A, Fayed N, Bickenbach J, Prodinger B. Refinements of the ICF Linking Rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information. Disabil Rehabil 2016;41:574-83. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2016.1145
Madaschi V. Tradução, adaptação transcultural e evidências de validade das escalas Bayley III de desenvolvimento infantil em uma população do município de Barueri, São Paulo (PhD thesis). São Paulo: Mackenzie; 2012.
Saccani R. Validação da Alberta Infant Motor Scale para aplicação no Brasil: análise do desenvolvimento motor e fatores de risco para atraso em crianças de 0 a 18 meses (Master’s thesis). Porto Alegre: UFRGS; 2009.
https://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/handle/10183/18975/000733746.pdf
Pinheiro CL. Validade e confiabilidade da Movement Assessment Battery For Children - 2ª edição para crianças brasileiras de 4 a 8 anos de idade (Master’s thesis). Belo Horizonte: UFMG; 2015. http://www.eeffto.ufmg.br/eeffto/DATA/defesas/20170320155209.pdf
Mancini MC. Inventário da avaliação pediátrica de incapacidade (PEDI): manual da versão brasileira adaptada (Internet address). Belo Horizonte: UFMG; 2005 (acessed in: 2022/09/13). Available from: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4508637/mod_folder/content/0/Protocolos%20de%20avalia%C3%A7%C3%A3o/PEDI/PEDI2.pdf?forcedownload=1
Valentini NC, Barbosa M, Cini GV, Pick RK, Spessato B, Balbinotti M. Test of gross motor development: Expert validity, confirmatory validity and internal consistence. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desem Hum 2008;10:399-404. https://doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2008v10n4p399
Filgueiras A, Pires P, Maissonete S, Landeira-Fernandez J. Psychometric properties of the Brazilian-adapted version of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire in public child daycare centers. Early Hum Dev 2013;89:561-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.02.005
Frankenburg W, Dodds JB, Archer P, Bresnick B, Maschka P, Edelman N, et al. Denver II: teste de triagem do desenvolvimento: manual de treinamento (Internet address). São Paulo: Hogrefe; 2017 (acessed in: 2022/09/13). Available from: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4508637/mod_folder/content/0/Protocolos%20de%20avalia%C3%A7%C3%A3o/Denver%20II/Manual%20DenverII.pdf?forcedownload=1
Florian L, Hollenweger J, Simeonsson R, Wedell K, Riddell S, Terzi L, et al. Cross-cultural perspectives on the classification of children with disabilities: Part I. Issues in the classification of children with disabilities. J Spec Educ 2006;40:36-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669060400010401
Conceição FS, Gerzson LR, Almeida CS. Interação familiar e social no desenvolvimento motor infantil: uma revisão integrativa. Cad Edu Saude Fis 2019;6:83-94. https://doi.org/10.18310/2358-8306.v6n12.a7
Almeida TGA, Caçola PM, Gabbard C, Correr MT, Vilela Junior GB, Santos DCC. Comparações entre o desempenho motor e oportunidades de estimulação motora no ambiente domiciliar de lactentes residentes nas regiões Sudeste e Norte do Brasil. Fisioter Pesq 2015;22:142-7. https://doi.org/10.590/1809-2950/13306322022015
Banátová K, Psotta R. The MABC-2 Checklist: A Review of the Psychometric Properties of A Screening Tool for Developmental Coordination Disorder. J Occupat Therap Sch Early Interv 2021;15:72-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2021.1934228
Santos LR, Barbosa E, Braga SEM, Moussa L, Mendes MRP. Avaliação do Desenvolvimento Neuropsicomotor por meio da Escala Motora Infantil Alberta e sua Importância na Intervenção Precoce: uma revisão de literatura. Pesq Ação 2017;2:36-45. http://publicacoes.unifran.br/index.php/pesquisa/article/view/331/454
Vaz DV, Silva PL, Mancini MC, Carello C, Kinsella-Shaw J. Towards an ecologically grounded functional practice in rehabilitation. Hum Mov Sci 2017;52:117-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2017.01.010
Dornelas LF, Defilipo EC. Proposta de roteiro para avaliação dos fatores ambientais de crianças e adolescentes sob a perspectiva da CIF. Rev Pesqui Fisioter 2022;12:e4732. https://doi.org/10.17267/2238-2704rpf.2022.e4732
Mélo TR, Araujo LB, Novakoski KRM, Israel VL. Instrumentos de avaliação de bebês pelo modelo da CIF. Fisioter Pesquis 2019;26:380-93. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/18026126042019
Guimarães MAP, Magalhães LC, Moreira RS, Bessa FR, Alves CRL. Survey of Well-Being of Young Children (SWYC): Preliminary Norms for Screening for Developmental Delay in Brazilian Children Younger than 65 Months. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2022;00:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001133
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ana Caroline Belo Alencar, José Davi Nunes Martins, Marcela de Castro Ferracioli Gama, Shamyr Sulyvan de Castro, Kátia Virgínia Viana Cardoso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Accepted 2023-04-19
Published 2023-05-09
