As abordagens de Nietzsche acerca da epistemologia e da ética kantianas

Autores

  • Tom Bailey Professor da John Cabot University e LUISS “Guido Carli”, Roma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34024/cadniet.2011.n29.7760

Palavras-chave:

Nietzsche, Kant, neokantismo, idealismo, ética, vontade

Resumo

Este artigo explora as abordagens de Nietzsche acerca do idealismo e da ética kantianos. Depo is de considerar suas abordagens juvenis inconclusas acerca do idealismo kantiano, o artigo sustenta que, ao rejeitar posteriormente o idealismo kantiano, Nietzsche afirma, em vez de negar, que a realidade nos é acessível, e também supera sua anterior recusa kantiana de que podemos produzir juízos acerca dessa realidade. O artigo sustenta, então, que as críticas explícitas de Nietzsche à ética kantiana não são convincentes, mas que ele também desenvolveu uma ética “kantiana” a seu modo. Assim, o artigo pretende mostrar que elementos negligenciados das abordagens de Nietzsche acerca de Kant são mais proveitosos do que aqueles comumente enfatizados.

Referências

ALLISON, H.E. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. 1st ed./2nd ed., London: Yale University Press, 1983/2004.

____________. ‘On a Presumed Gap in the Derivation of the Categorical Imperative’. In: ALLISON, H., Idealism and Freedom: Essays on Kant’s Theoretical and Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 143-154.

ANDERSON, R. Lanier. ‘Overcoming Charity: The Case of Maudemarie Clark’s Nietzsche on Truth and Philosophy’. Nietzsche-Studien (1996), 25, pp. 307-341.

____________. ‘Truth and Objectivity in Perspectivism’. Synthese (1998), 115, pp. 1-32.

____________. ‘Nietzsche’s Views on Truth and the Kantian Background of his Epistemology’. In: BABICH, B. (org.) Nietzsche and the Sciences, 2 vols., Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999, vol. 2, Nietzsche, Epistemology

and Philosophy of Science, pp. 47-59.

____________. ‘Sensualism and Unconscious Representations in Nietzsche’s Account of Knowledge’. International Studies in Philosophy (2002), 34/3, pp. 95-117.

____________. ‘Nietzsche on Truth, Illusion and Redemption’. European Journal of Philosophy (2005), 13/2, pp. 185-225.

ANSELL-PEARSON, K. ‘Nietzsche’s Overcoming of Kant and Metaphysics: From Tragedy to Nihilism’. Nietzsche-Studien (1987), 16, pp. 310-339.

BAILEY, T. Nietzsche’s Kantian Ethics. International Studies in Philosophy (2003), 35/3, pp. 5-27.

____________. After Kant: Green and Hill on Nietzsche’s Kantianism. Nietzsche-Studien (2006), 35, pp. 228-262.

____________. Nietzsche’s Engagements with Kant. In: GEMES, K., and RICHARDSON, J. (org.) Oxford Handbook of Nietzsche. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

____________. La filosofia come pratica di comunità: Leggere La Gaia Scienza II e Così Parlò Zarathustra IV. In: CAMPIONI, G., PIAZZESI, C., and WOTLING, P. (org.) Letture de La Gaia Scienza. Pisa: ETS, 2010,

pp. 55-67.

____________. ‘Vulnerabilities of Agency: Kant and Nietzsche on Political Community’. In: CONSTANCIO, J. (org.) Nietzsche on the Language of Philosophy, Morality and Art. Oxford: Lang, 2011.

________________. ‘Nietzsche on Autonomy and Political Obligation’. In: DENAT, C., and PIAZZESI, C. (org.) Nietzsche penseur de la politique? Nietzsche penseur du social? Éditions d’Ariane, 2011.BROBJER, Thomas. ‘Nachweise aus Höffding, Harald: Psychologie in Umrissen u.a.’. Nietzsche-Studien (2001), 30, pp. 418-421.

____________. ‘Nietzsche as German Philosopher: His Reading of the Classical German Philosophers’. In: MARTIN, N. (org.) Nietzsche and the German Tradition. Oxford: Lang, 2003, pp. 39-83.

____________. Nietzsche’s Philosophical Context: An Intellectual Biography, Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2008.

BROWN, Richard. ‘Nietzsche and Kant on Permanence’. Man and World (1980), 13, pp. 39-52.

CAMPIONI, Giuliano, D’IORIO, Paolo, FORNARI, Maria Cristina, FRONTEROTTA, Francesco, ORSUCCI, Andrea, and MÜLLER-BUCK, Renate. Nietzsches persönliche Bibliothek. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2003.

CLARK, Maudemarie. Nietzsche on Truth and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

________________. ‘On Knowledge, Truth and Value: Nietzsche’s Debt to Schopenhauer and the Development of his Empiricism’. In: JANAWAY, C. (org.) Willing and Nothingness: Schopenhauer as Nietzsche’s Educator. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 37-78.

_______________. and DUDRICK, David. ‘Nietzsche’s Post-Positivism’. European Journal of Philosophy (2004), 12/3, pp. 369-385.

____________. ‘Nietzsche and Green on the Transcendental Tradition’. International Studies in Philosophy (2005), 37/3, pp. 5-28.

______________. and DUDRICK, David. ‘The Naturalisms of Beyond Good and Evil’. In: ANSELL-PEARSON, K. (org.) A Companion to Nietzsche. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006, pp. 148-167.

CONRAD, Mark T. ‘Nietzsche’s Kantianism’. International Studies in Philosophy (2001), 33/3, pp. 25-36.

CRAWFORD, Claudia. The Beginnings of Nietzsche’s Theory of Language. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1988.

____________. “The Dionysian Worldview”: Nietzsche’s Symbolic Languages and Music’. Journal of Nietzsche Studies (1997), 13, pp. 72-80.

CRESCENZI, Luca. ‘Verzeichnis der von Nietzsche aus der Universitätsbibliothek in Basel entliehenen Bücher (1869-1879)’. Nietzsche-Studien (1994), 23, pp. 388-442.

CROWELL, Steven Galt. ‘Nietzsche Among the Neo-Kantians; Or, the Relation Between Science and Philosophy’. In: BABICH, B. (org.) Nietzsche and the Sciences, 2 vols., Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999, vol. 1, Nietzsche, Theories of Knowledge and Critical Theory, pp. 77-86.

DANTO, Arthur C. Nietzsche as Philosopher. Guildford: Columbia University Press, 1965.

DELEUZE, Gilles. Nietzsche et la philosophie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1962.

D’IORIO, P. ‘La Superstition des Philosophes Critiques. Nietzsche et Afrikan Spir’. Nietzsche-Studien (1993), 22, pp. 257-294.

DOYLE, Tsarina. ‘Nietzsche’s Appropriation of Kant’. Nietzsche-Studien (2004), 33, pp. 180-204.

____________. Nietzsche on Epistemology and Metaphysics: The World in View. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009.DUDLEY, Will. Hegel, Nietzsche and Philosophy: Thinking Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

FAZIO, D.M. ‘Il pensiero del giovane Nietzsche e Afrikan Spir’. Bollettino di Storia della Filosofia dell’Università degli Studi di Lecce (1986-1989), 9, pp. 243-262.

FISCHER, Kuno. Immanuel Kant und seine Lehre. 2 vols., 1st ed., Mannheim: Basserman, 1860-1861.

GREEN, M. S.. Nietzsche and the Transcendental Tradition. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2002.

____________. ‘White and Clark on Nietzsche and the Transcendental Tradition’. International Studies in Philosophy (2005), 37/3, pp. 45-75.

HARTMANN, E. von. Philosophie des Unbewußten. Versuch einer Weltanschauung. Berlin: Duncker, 1869.

____________. Phänomenologie des sittlichen Bewußtseins, Berlin: Duncker, 1879.

HILL, R. K. Nietzsche’s Critiques: The Kantian Foundations of his Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.

HOULGATE, S. ‘Kant, Nietzsche and the Thing in Itself’. Nietzsche-Studien (1993), 22, pp. 115-157.

IBÁÑEZ-NOÉ, J. ‘Nietzsche and Kant’s Copernican Revolution: On Nietzsche’s Subjectivism’. New Nietzsche Studies (2002), 5/1-2, pp. 132-149.

JANZ, C. P.. Friedrich Nietzsche. Biographie. 3 vols., Munich: Deutsche Taschenbuch, 1979.

KANT, I. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten (1785). In: Königlich Preuβische (now Deutsche) Akademie der Wissenschaften (org.), Kants gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Georg Reimer (now De Gruyter), 1900- , vol. 4.

____________. Kritik der praktischen Vernunft (1788). In: Königlich Preuβische (now Deutsche) Akademie der Wissenschaften (org.), Kants gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Georg Reimer (now De Gruyter), 1900- , vol. 5.

____________. ‘Erste Einleitung in der Kritik der Urteilskraft’ (1789-1790). In: Königlich Preuβische (now Deutsche) Akademie der Wissenschaften (org.), Kants gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Georg Reimer (now De Gruyter), 1900- , vol. 20.

____________. Kritik der Urteilskraft (1790). In: Königlich Preuβische (now Deutsche) Akademie der Wissenschaften (org.), Kants gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Georg Reimer (now De Gruyter), 1900- , vol. 5.

____________. Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft (1st ed./2nd ed., 1792-1793/1794). In: Königlich Preuβische (now Deutsche) Akademie der Wissenschaften (org.), Kants gesammelte Schriften.

Berlin: Georg Reimer (now De Gruyter), 1900- , vol.6.

____________. ‘Über den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis’ (1793). In: Königlich Preuβische (now Deutsche) Akademie der Wissenschaften (org.), Kants gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Georg Reimer (now De Gruyter), 1900- , vol. 8.

____________. Die Metaphysik der Sitten. (1st ed./2nd ed., 1797/1798). In: Königlich Preuβische (now Deutsche) Akademie der Wissenschaften (org.), Kants gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Georg Reimer (now De Gruyter), 1900- , vol. 6.

____________. Der Streit der Fakultäten (1798). In: Königlich Preuβische (now Deutsche) Akademie der Wissenschaften (org.), Kants gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Georg Reimer (now De Gruyter), 1900- , vol. 7.

____________. Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht (1798). In: Königlich Preuβische (now Deutsche) Akademie der Wissenschaften (org.), Kants gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Georg Reimer (now De Gruyter), 1900- , vol. 7.

LANGE, F. Geschichte des Materialismus und Kritik seiner Bedeutung in der Gegenwart. 1st ed./4th ed./reprint of 4th ed., Iserlohn: Baedeker, 1866/1882/1887.

LIEBMANN, O. Kant und die Epigonen. Eine Kritische Abhandlung, Stuttgart: Schober, 1865.

____________. Zur Analysis der Wirklichkeit. Eine Erörterung der Grundprobleme der Philosophie. 2nd ed., Straßburg: Trübner, 1880.

____________. Gedanken und Thatsachen. Philosophische Abhandlungen, Aphorismen und Studien. Pt. 1, Die Arten der Nothwendigkeit – Die mechanische Naturerklärung – Idee und Entelechie. Straßburg: Trübner, 1882.

MAY, S. Nietzsche’s Ethics and his War on ‘Morality’. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

MOSSER, K. ‘Nietzsche, Kant and the Thing in Itself’. International Studies in Philosophy (1993), 25/2, pp. 67-77.

MÜLLER-LAUTER, W. ‘Nietzsches Auf-lösung des Problems der Willensfreiheit’. In: BAUSCHINGER, S., COCALIS, S. L., and LENNOX, S. (org.) Nietzsche heute. Die Rezeption seines Werkes nach 1968. Stuttgart: Francke, 1995, pp. 23-73.

NEHAMAS, A. Nietzsche: Life as Literature, London: Harvard University Press, 1985.

ORSUCCI, A. ‘Teichmüller, Nietzsche e la critica delle “mitologie scientifiche”’. Giornale critico della filosofia italiana (1997), 17, pp. 47-63.

OWEN, David. Maturity and Modernity: Nietzsche, Weber, Foucault and the Ambivalence of Reason. London: Routledge, 1994.

_____________. Nietzsche, Politics and Modernity: A Critique of Liberal Reason, London: Sage, 1995.

____________. ‘Nietzsche, Enlightenment and the Problem of Noble Ethics’. In: LIPPITT, J. (org.) Nietzsche’s Futures. London: Macmillan, 1999, pp. 3-29.

RAMPLEY, M. Nietzsche, Aesthetics and Modernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

RIDLEY, A. Nietzsche’s Conscience: Six Character Studies from the “Genealogy”. London: Cornell University Press, 1998.

SÁNCHEZ, S. El Problema del Conocimiento en la Filosofia del Joven Nietzsche. Los Postumos del Periodo 1867-73. Córdoba: Editorial Universitas, 1999.

_______________. ‘Logica, Verità, e Credenza. Alcune Considerazioni in Merito alla Relazione NietzscheSpir’. In: FORNARI, M. C. (org.) La Trama del Testo. Su Alcune Letture di Nietzsche. Lecce: Edizioni Milella, 2000, pp. 249-282.

________________. ‘Linguaggio, Conoscenza, e Verità nella Filosofia del Giovane Nietzsche. I Frammenti Postumi del 1873 e le loro Fonti’. Annurario Filosofico (2000), 16, pp. 213-240.SCHOPENHAUER, A. ‘Über die Grundlage der Moral’. In: Die Beiden Grundprobleme der Ethik, Frankfurt: Hermann, 1841.

_______________. Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung. 2nd ed., 2 vols., Leipzig: Brockhaus, 1844.

_______________. Parerga und Paralipomena. Kleine philosophische Schriften. 2 vols., Berlin: Hayn, 1851.

SIMON, J. ‘Moral bei Kant und Nietzsche’. Nietzsche-Studien (2000), 29, pp. 178-198.

SMALL, R. Nietzsche in Context. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001.

SPIR, A. Forschung nach der Gewissheit in der Erkenntniss der Wirklichkeit. Leipzig: Förster und Findel, 1869.

____________. Denken und Wirklichkeit. Versuch einer Erneuerung der kritischen Philosophie. 1st ed./2nd ed., 2 vols., Leipzig: Findel, 1873/1877.

STACK, G. J. ‘Nietzsche’s Critique of Things-in-Themselves’. Diálogos (1980), 15/36, pp. 33-57.

____________. Lange and Nietzsche. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1983.

____________. ‘Kant and Nietzsche’s Analysis of Knowledge’. Diálogos (1987), 22/49, pp. 7-40.

____________. ‘Kant, Lange and Nietzsche: Critique of Knowledge’. In: ANSELL-PEARSON, K. (org.) Nietzsche and Modern German Thought. London: Routledge, 1991, pp. 30-58.

TEICHMÜLLER, G. Aristotelischen Forschungen. 3 vols., Halle: Barthel, 1867-1873.

____________. Über die Reihenfolge der platonischen Dialoge. Leipzig: Köhler, 1879.

____________. Neue Studien zur Geschichte der Begriffe. 3 vols., Gotha: Perthes, 1879.

____________. Die wirkliche und die scheinbare Welt. Neue Grundlegung der Metaphysik. Breslau: Koebner, 1882.

ÜBERWEG, F. Grundriß der Geschichte der Philosophie von Thales bis auf die Gegenwart. 3 vols., Berlin: Mittler, 1866-1867.

WEISS, S. D. ‘Nietzsche and the Thing in Itself: Surviving Modern Kant Scholarship’. International Studies in Philosophy (1993), 25/2, pp. 79-84.

WOOD, A. W. Kant’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Downloads

Publicado

2019-03-06

Edição

n. 29 (2011)

Seção

Artigos Originais

Licença

Licença Creative Commons
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)

Obs .: Este plugin requer que pelo menos um plugin de estatísticas / relatório esteja ativado. Se seus plugins de estatísticas fornecerem mais de uma métrica, selecione também uma métrica principal na página de configurações do site do administrador e / ou nas páginas de configurações do gerente da revista.