La crisis epistemológica de la teoría económica marxista

Autores/as

  • Matias Petersen Universidad de los Andes, Chile

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34024/prometeica.2020.20.10021

Palabras clave:

MacIntyre, tradición intelectual, teoría económica Marxista, crisis epistemológicas

Resumen

En Ética en los conflictos de la modernidad, MacIntyre sostiene que el neo-Aristotelismo contemporáneo tiene mucho que aprender de la teoría económica Marxista; no sólo para comprender la naturaleza del capitalismo, sino también para imaginar instituciones sociales alternativas. Este artículo resume los argumentos dados por MacIntyre en defensa de la relevancia política de la teoría económica Marxista. Se sostiene que, si la teoría económica Marxista es una tradición intelectual, en el sentido que MacIntyre le da a estos términos, debemos tomarnos en serio los debates históricos al interior de la tradición marxista para evaluar si ésta ha sido capaz de sobreponerse a la crítica tanto interna como externa. Se argumenta que la teoría económica Marxista, en cuanto tradición intelectual, ha sido derrotada por sus rivales y que una síntesis entre la filosofía moral Aristotélica y la teoría económica Marxista es un obstáculo para el desarrollo de la filosofía política de MacIntryre.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Arrow, K. J. (1951). An Extension of the Basic Theorems of Classical Welfare Economics. Stanford University.

Neyman, J. (2006). (Ed.). Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. (pp. 507–532). University of California Press. Berkeley.

Bator, F. M. (1958). “The anatomy of market failure”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 72(3). 351–379.

Blackledge, P., & Knight, K. (2011a). “Introduction: Towards a Virtuous Politics”. In P. Blackledge & K. Knight (Eds.). Virtue and Politics: Alasdair MacIntyre’s Revolutionary Aristotelianism. (pp. 1–10). University of Notre Dame Press. Notre Dame.

Blackledge, P., & Knight, K. (2011b). Virtue and Politics: Alasdair MacIntyre’s Revolutionary Aristotelianism. University of Notre Dame Press. Notre Dame.

Boettke, P. J. (1997). “Where did economics go wrong? Modern economics as a flight from reality”. Critical Review. 11(1). 11–64.

Bowles, S. (2016). The Moral Economy: Why Good Incentives are No Substitute for Good Citizens. New HavenYale. University Press. London.

Burczak, T. A. (2006). Socialism after Hayek. University of Michigan Press. Ann Arbor.

Burns, T. (2011). “Revolutionary Aristotelianism? The Political Thought of Aristotle, Marx, and MacIntyre”. In P. Blackledge & K. Knight (Eds.). Virtue and Politics. Alasdair MacIntyre’s Revolutionary Aristotelianism. (pp. 35–53). University of Notre Dame Press. Notre Dame, Indiana.

Burns, T. (2017). “Marx, the labour theory of value and the transformation problem”. Capital & Class. 41(3). 493–510.

Campagnolo, G. (2013). “Elements of the reception of Aristotelian thought in 19th century German-language philosophy and economics”. Philosophia, 73(2). 13–36.

Debreu, G. (1959). Theory of Value. An Axiomatic Analysis Of Economic Equilibrium. Yale University Press. New Haven.

Elster, J. (1990). An Introduction to Karl Marx. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Elster, J. (2009). “Excessive ambitions”. Capitalism and Society. 4(2). 1–30.

Gibbard, A. (1998). “Preference and Preferability”. In U. Wessels & C. Fehige (Eds.). Preferences (pp. 239–259). Walter de Gruyter. Berlin.

Gregson, J. (2019). Marxism, Ethics and Politics: The Work of Alasdair MacIntyre. Palgrave Macmillan. Cham, Switzerland.

Hausman, D. M., & McPherson, M. S. (2007). “The Philosophical Foundations of Mainstream Normative Economics”. In D. M. Hausman (Ed.). The Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology (pp. 226–251). Cambridge University Press. New York.

Hilferding, R. (1949). “Böhm-Bawerk’s Criticism of Marx”. In P. Sweezy (Ed.). Karl Marx and the Close of his System. (pp. 119–196). Augustus M. Kelly. New York.

Hobsbawm, E. (1982). “The fortune of Marx’s and Engels’ writings”. In The History of Marxism: Vol. I. Marxism in Marx’s days (pp. 327–344). Indiana University Press. Bloomington.

Hodgson, G. M. (2009). “Institutional Economics into the Twenty-First Century”. Studi E Note Di Economia. 14(1). 3–26.

Howard, M. C., & King, J. E. (1989). A History of Marxian Economics. Princeton University Press. New Jersey.

Kline, G. L. (1988). “The Myth of Marx’s Materialism”. In Sovietica: Vol. 50. Philosophical Sovietology. (pp. 158–203). Springer. Dordrecht.

Kolakowski, L. (1981). Main Currents of Marxism: Its Origins, Growth and Dissolution. Oxford University Press. Oxford.

Lutz, C. S. (2009). Tradition in the Ethics of Alasdair MacIntyre. Lexington Books. Plymouth.

MacIntyre, A. (1977). “Epistemological crises, dramatic narrative and the philosophy of science”. The Monist, 60(4). 453–472.

MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue. A Study in Moral Theory. Bloomsbury. London.

MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Duckworth. London.

MacIntyre, A. (1990). Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry. Encyclopaedia, Genealogy, and Tradition. Duckworth. London.

MacIntyre, A. (1995). Marxism and Christianity. Duckworth. London.

MacIntyre, A. (1998a). “Notes from the Moral Wildernes”. In K. Knight (Ed.). The MacIntyre Reader. (pp. 31–49). Polity Press. Oxford.

MacIntyre, A. (1998b). “Social Science Methodology as the Ideology of Bureaucratic Authority”. In K. Knight (Ed.). The MacIntyre Reader. (pp. 53–68). Polity Press. Cambridge.

MacIntyre, A. (2009). “Intractable Moral Disagreements”. In L. S. Cunningham (Ed.). Intractable Disputes about the Natural Law: Alasdair MacIntyre and Critics. (pp. 1–52). University of Notre Dame Press. Notre Dame, Indiana.

MacIntyre, A. (2011). “Where We Were, Where We Are, Where We Need to Be”. In P. Blackledge & K. Knight (Eds.). Virtue and Politics. Alasdair MacIntyre’s Revolutionary Aristotelianism. (pp. 307–334). University of Notre Dame Press. Notre Dame, Indiana.

MacIntyre, A. (2016a). Ethics in the conflicts of modernity: An essay on desire, practical reasoning, and narrative. Cambridge University Press. New York.

MacIntyre, A. (2016b). “The Irrelevance of Ethics”. In A. Bielskis & K. Knight (Eds.). Virtue and Economy. Essays on Morality and Markets (pp. 7–21). Routledge. London.

Mandel, E. (1990). “Introduction”. In Capital, Volume I (pp. 11–86). Penguin Classics. London.

Marx, K. (1976). Capital, Volume I. Pelican Books. London. (Original work published 1873).

Marx, K. (1981). Capital, Volume III. Pelican Books. London. (Original work published 1885).

McCloskey, D. N. (2010). Bourgeois Dignity. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.

Meikle, S. (1985). Essentialism in the Thought of Karl Marx. Duckworth. London.

Mittermaier, K. (2018). “Menger’s Aristotelianism”. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 42(2), 577–594.

Murphy, M. C. (2003). “Introduction”. In M. C. Murphy (Ed.). Alasdair MacIntyre. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Mühlpfort, W. (1895). “Karl Marx und die Durchschnittsprofitrate”. Jahrbücher Für Nationalökonomie. 65. 92–99.

Niehans, J. (1990). A History of Economic Theory. Classic Contributions, 1720-1980. The Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore.

Porter, J. (2003). “Tradition in the Recent Work of Alasdair MacIntyre”. In M. C. Murphy (Ed.). Alasdair MacIntyre. (pp. 38–69). Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Quaas, F. (1994). “Wolfgang Mühlpfordt and the ‘transformation problem’: Some remarks on articles by Howard and King and Gilbert”. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 18(3). 323–326.

Roemer, J. (Ed.). (1986a). Analytical Marxism. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Roemer, J. (1986b). “Should Marxists be interested in exploitation?” In J. Roemer (Ed.). Analytical Marxism (pp. 260–282). Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Roemer, J. (1988). Free to Lose: An Introduction to Marxist Economic Philosophy. Harvard University Press. Cambridge.

Samuelson, P. A. (1957). “Wages and interest: A modern dissection of Marxian economic models”. The American Economic Review. 47(6). 884–912.

Sankey, H. (1993). “Kuhn’s Changing Concept of Incommensurability”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 44(4). 759–774.

Screpanti, E. (2003). “Value and Exploitation: A counterfactual approach”. Review of Political Economy. 15(2). 155–171.

Screpanti, E., & Zamagni, S. (2005). An Outline of the History of Economic Thought. Oxford University Press. Oxford.

Smith, B. (1990). “Aristotle, Menger, Mises: An Essay in the Metaphysics of Economics”. History of Political Economy. 22 (Annual Supplement). 263–288.

Sombart, W. (1894). “Zur Kritik des Ökonomischen System von Karl Marx”. Archiv Für Sozialgesetzgebung Und Statistik. 7. 555–594.

Tullock, G. (1967). “The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies, and Theft”. Western Economic Journal. 5(3). 224–232.

Publicado

2020-01-21

Cómo citar

Petersen, M. (2020). La crisis epistemológica de la teoría económica marxista. Prometeica - Revista De Filosofía Y Ciencias, (20), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.34024/prometeica.2020.20.10021
Recebió: 2019-11-27
Aceptado: 2020-01-11
Publicado: 2020-01-21

Artículos similares

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.