As abordagens de Nietzsche acerca da epistemologia e da ética kantianas

Autores

  • Tom Bailey Professor da John Cabot University e LUISS “Guido Carli”, Roma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34024/cadniet.2011.n29.7760

Palavras-chave:

Nietzsche, Kant, neokantismo, idealismo, ética, vontade

Resumo

Este artigo explora as abordagens de Nietzsche acerca do idealismo e da ética kantianos. Depo is de considerar suas abordagens juvenis inconclusas acerca do idealismo kantiano, o artigo sustenta que, ao rejeitar posteriormente o idealismo kantiano, Nietzsche afirma, em vez de negar, que a realidade nos é acessível, e também supera sua anterior recusa kantiana de que podemos produzir juízos acerca dessa realidade. O artigo sustenta, então, que as críticas explícitas de Nietzsche à ética kantiana não são convincentes, mas que ele também desenvolveu uma ética “kantiana” a seu modo. Assim, o artigo pretende mostrar que elementos negligenciados das abordagens de Nietzsche acerca de Kant são mais proveitosos do que aqueles comumente enfatizados.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

ALLISON, H.E. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. 1st ed./2nd ed., London: Yale University Press, 1983/2004.

____________. ‘On a Presumed Gap in the Derivation of the Categorical Imperative’. In: ALLISON, H., Idealism and Freedom: Essays on Kant’s Theoretical and Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 143-154.

ANDERSON, R. Lanier. ‘Overcoming Charity: The Case of Maudemarie Clark’s Nietzsche on Truth and Philosophy’. Nietzsche-Studien (1996), 25, pp. 307-341.

____________. ‘Truth and Objectivity in Perspectivism’. Synthese (1998), 115, pp. 1-32.

____________. ‘Nietzsche’s Views on Truth and the Kantian Background of his Epistemology’. In: BABICH, B. (org.) Nietzsche and the Sciences, 2 vols., Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999, vol. 2, Nietzsche, Epistemology

and Philosophy of Science, pp. 47-59.

____________. ‘Sensualism and Unconscious Representations in Nietzsche’s Account of Knowledge’. International Studies in Philosophy (2002), 34/3, pp. 95-117.

____________. ‘Nietzsche on Truth, Illusion and Redemption’. European Journal of Philosophy (2005), 13/2, pp. 185-225.

ANSELL-PEARSON, K. ‘Nietzsche’s Overcoming of Kant and Metaphysics: From Tragedy to Nihilism’. Nietzsche-Studien (1987), 16, pp. 310-339.

BAILEY, T. Nietzsche’s Kantian Ethics. International Studies in Philosophy (2003), 35/3, pp. 5-27.

____________. After Kant: Green and Hill on Nietzsche’s Kantianism. Nietzsche-Studien (2006), 35, pp. 228-262.

____________. Nietzsche’s Engagements with Kant. In: GEMES, K., and RICHARDSON, J. (org.) Oxford Handbook of Nietzsche. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

____________. La filosofia come pratica di comunità: Leggere La Gaia Scienza II e Così Parlò Zarathustra IV. In: CAMPIONI, G., PIAZZESI, C., and WOTLING, P. (org.) Letture de La Gaia Scienza. Pisa: ETS, 2010,

pp. 55-67.

____________. ‘Vulnerabilities of Agency: Kant and Nietzsche on Political Community’. In: CONSTANCIO, J. (org.) Nietzsche on the Language of Philosophy, Morality and Art. Oxford: Lang, 2011.

________________. ‘Nietzsche on Autonomy and Political Obligation’. In: DENAT, C., and PIAZZESI, C. (org.) Nietzsche penseur de la politique? Nietzsche penseur du social? Éditions d’Ariane, 2011.BROBJER, Thomas. ‘Nachweise aus Höffding, Harald: Psychologie in Umrissen u.a.’. Nietzsche-Studien (2001), 30, pp. 418-421.

____________. ‘Nietzsche as German Philosopher: His Reading of the Classical German Philosophers’. In: MARTIN, N. (org.) Nietzsche and the German Tradition. Oxford: Lang, 2003, pp. 39-83.

____________. Nietzsche’s Philosophical Context: An Intellectual Biography, Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2008.

BROWN, Richard. ‘Nietzsche and Kant on Permanence’. Man and World (1980), 13, pp. 39-52.

CAMPIONI, Giuliano, D’IORIO, Paolo, FORNARI, Maria Cristina, FRONTEROTTA, Francesco, ORSUCCI, Andrea, and MÜLLER-BUCK, Renate. Nietzsches persönliche Bibliothek. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2003.

CLARK, Maudemarie. Nietzsche on Truth and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

________________. ‘On Knowledge, Truth and Value: Nietzsche’s Debt to Schopenhauer and the Development of his Empiricism’. In: JANAWAY, C. (org.) Willing and Nothingness: Schopenhauer as Nietzsche’s Educator. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 37-78.

_______________. and DUDRICK, David. ‘Nietzsche’s Post-Positivism’. European Journal of Philosophy (2004), 12/3, pp. 369-385.

____________. ‘Nietzsche and Green on the Transcendental Tradition’. International Studies in Philosophy (2005), 37/3, pp. 5-28.

______________. and DUDRICK, David. ‘The Naturalisms of Beyond Good and Evil’. In: ANSELL-PEARSON, K. (org.) A Companion to Nietzsche. Oxford: Blackwell, 2006, pp. 148-167.

CONRAD, Mark T. ‘Nietzsche’s Kantianism’. International Studies in Philosophy (2001), 33/3, pp. 25-36.

CRAWFORD, Claudia. The Beginnings of Nietzsche’s Theory of Language. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1988.

____________. “The Dionysian Worldview”: Nietzsche’s Symbolic Languages and Music’. Journal of Nietzsche Studies (1997), 13, pp. 72-80.

CRESCENZI, Luca. ‘Verzeichnis der von Nietzsche aus der Universitätsbibliothek in Basel entliehenen Bücher (1869-1879)’. Nietzsche-Studien (1994), 23, pp. 388-442.

CROWELL, Steven Galt. ‘Nietzsche Among the Neo-Kantians; Or, the Relation Between Science and Philosophy’. In: BABICH, B. (org.) Nietzsche and the Sciences, 2 vols., Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999, vol. 1, Nietzsche, Theories of Knowledge and Critical Theory, pp. 77-86.

DANTO, Arthur C. Nietzsche as Philosopher. Guildford: Columbia University Press, 1965.

DELEUZE, Gilles. Nietzsche et la philosophie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1962.

D’IORIO, P. ‘La Superstition des Philosophes Critiques. Nietzsche et Afrikan Spir’. Nietzsche-Studien (1993), 22, pp. 257-294.

DOYLE, Tsarina. ‘Nietzsche’s Appropriation of Kant’. Nietzsche-Studien (2004), 33, pp. 180-204.

____________. Nietzsche on Epistemology and Metaphysics: The World in View. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009.DUDLEY, Will. Hegel, Nietzsche and Philosophy: Thinking Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

FAZIO, D.M. ‘Il pensiero del giovane Nietzsche e Afrikan Spir’. Bollettino di Storia della Filosofia dell’Università degli Studi di Lecce (1986-1989), 9, pp. 243-262.

FISCHER, Kuno. Immanuel Kant und seine Lehre. 2 vols., 1st ed., Mannheim: Basserman, 1860-1861.

GREEN, M. S.. Nietzsche and the Transcendental Tradition. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2002.

____________. ‘White and Clark on Nietzsche and the Transcendental Tradition’. International Studies in Philosophy (2005), 37/3, pp. 45-75.

HARTMANN, E. von. Philosophie des Unbewußten. Versuch einer Weltanschauung. Berlin: Duncker, 1869.

____________. Phänomenologie des sittlichen Bewußtseins, Berlin: Duncker, 1879.

HILL, R. K. Nietzsche’s Critiques: The Kantian Foundations of his Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.

HOULGATE, S. ‘Kant, Nietzsche and the Thing in Itself’. Nietzsche-Studien (1993), 22, pp. 115-157.

IBÁÑEZ-NOÉ, J. ‘Nietzsche and Kant’s Copernican Revolution: On Nietzsche’s Subjectivism’. New Nietzsche Studies (2002), 5/1-2, pp. 132-149.

JANZ, C. P.. Friedrich Nietzsche. Biographie. 3 vols., Munich: Deutsche Taschenbuch, 1979.

KANT, I. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten (1785). In: Königlich Preuβische (now Deutsche) Akademie der Wissenschaften (org.), Kants gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Georg Reimer (now De Gruyter), 1900- , vol. 4.

____________. Kritik der praktischen Vernunft (1788). In: Königlich Preuβische (now Deutsche) Akademie der Wissenschaften (org.), Kants gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Georg Reimer (now De Gruyter), 1900- , vol. 5.

____________. ‘Erste Einleitung in der Kritik der Urteilskraft’ (1789-1790). In: Königlich Preuβische (now Deutsche) Akademie der Wissenschaften (org.), Kants gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Georg Reimer (now De Gruyter), 1900- , vol. 20.

____________. Kritik der Urteilskraft (1790). In: Königlich Preuβische (now Deutsche) Akademie der Wissenschaften (org.), Kants gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Georg Reimer (now De Gruyter), 1900- , vol. 5.

____________. Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der bloßen Vernunft (1st ed./2nd ed., 1792-1793/1794). In: Königlich Preuβische (now Deutsche) Akademie der Wissenschaften (org.), Kants gesammelte Schriften.

Berlin: Georg Reimer (now De Gruyter), 1900- , vol.6.

____________. ‘Über den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis’ (1793). In: Königlich Preuβische (now Deutsche) Akademie der Wissenschaften (org.), Kants gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Georg Reimer (now De Gruyter), 1900- , vol. 8.

____________. Die Metaphysik der Sitten. (1st ed./2nd ed., 1797/1798). In: Königlich Preuβische (now Deutsche) Akademie der Wissenschaften (org.), Kants gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Georg Reimer (now De Gruyter), 1900- , vol. 6.

____________. Der Streit der Fakultäten (1798). In: Königlich Preuβische (now Deutsche) Akademie der Wissenschaften (org.), Kants gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Georg Reimer (now De Gruyter), 1900- , vol. 7.

____________. Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht (1798). In: Königlich Preuβische (now Deutsche) Akademie der Wissenschaften (org.), Kants gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Georg Reimer (now De Gruyter), 1900- , vol. 7.

LANGE, F. Geschichte des Materialismus und Kritik seiner Bedeutung in der Gegenwart. 1st ed./4th ed./reprint of 4th ed., Iserlohn: Baedeker, 1866/1882/1887.

LIEBMANN, O. Kant und die Epigonen. Eine Kritische Abhandlung, Stuttgart: Schober, 1865.

____________. Zur Analysis der Wirklichkeit. Eine Erörterung der Grundprobleme der Philosophie. 2nd ed., Straßburg: Trübner, 1880.

____________. Gedanken und Thatsachen. Philosophische Abhandlungen, Aphorismen und Studien. Pt. 1, Die Arten der Nothwendigkeit – Die mechanische Naturerklärung – Idee und Entelechie. Straßburg: Trübner, 1882.

MAY, S. Nietzsche’s Ethics and his War on ‘Morality’. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

MOSSER, K. ‘Nietzsche, Kant and the Thing in Itself’. International Studies in Philosophy (1993), 25/2, pp. 67-77.

MÜLLER-LAUTER, W. ‘Nietzsches Auf-lösung des Problems der Willensfreiheit’. In: BAUSCHINGER, S., COCALIS, S. L., and LENNOX, S. (org.) Nietzsche heute. Die Rezeption seines Werkes nach 1968. Stuttgart: Francke, 1995, pp. 23-73.

NEHAMAS, A. Nietzsche: Life as Literature, London: Harvard University Press, 1985.

ORSUCCI, A. ‘Teichmüller, Nietzsche e la critica delle “mitologie scientifiche”’. Giornale critico della filosofia italiana (1997), 17, pp. 47-63.

OWEN, David. Maturity and Modernity: Nietzsche, Weber, Foucault and the Ambivalence of Reason. London: Routledge, 1994.

_____________. Nietzsche, Politics and Modernity: A Critique of Liberal Reason, London: Sage, 1995.

____________. ‘Nietzsche, Enlightenment and the Problem of Noble Ethics’. In: LIPPITT, J. (org.) Nietzsche’s Futures. London: Macmillan, 1999, pp. 3-29.

RAMPLEY, M. Nietzsche, Aesthetics and Modernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.

RIDLEY, A. Nietzsche’s Conscience: Six Character Studies from the “Genealogy”. London: Cornell University Press, 1998.

SÁNCHEZ, S. El Problema del Conocimiento en la Filosofia del Joven Nietzsche. Los Postumos del Periodo 1867-73. Córdoba: Editorial Universitas, 1999.

_______________. ‘Logica, Verità, e Credenza. Alcune Considerazioni in Merito alla Relazione NietzscheSpir’. In: FORNARI, M. C. (org.) La Trama del Testo. Su Alcune Letture di Nietzsche. Lecce: Edizioni Milella, 2000, pp. 249-282.

________________. ‘Linguaggio, Conoscenza, e Verità nella Filosofia del Giovane Nietzsche. I Frammenti Postumi del 1873 e le loro Fonti’. Annurario Filosofico (2000), 16, pp. 213-240.SCHOPENHAUER, A. ‘Über die Grundlage der Moral’. In: Die Beiden Grundprobleme der Ethik, Frankfurt: Hermann, 1841.

_______________. Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung. 2nd ed., 2 vols., Leipzig: Brockhaus, 1844.

_______________. Parerga und Paralipomena. Kleine philosophische Schriften. 2 vols., Berlin: Hayn, 1851.

SIMON, J. ‘Moral bei Kant und Nietzsche’. Nietzsche-Studien (2000), 29, pp. 178-198.

SMALL, R. Nietzsche in Context. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001.

SPIR, A. Forschung nach der Gewissheit in der Erkenntniss der Wirklichkeit. Leipzig: Förster und Findel, 1869.

____________. Denken und Wirklichkeit. Versuch einer Erneuerung der kritischen Philosophie. 1st ed./2nd ed., 2 vols., Leipzig: Findel, 1873/1877.

STACK, G. J. ‘Nietzsche’s Critique of Things-in-Themselves’. Diálogos (1980), 15/36, pp. 33-57.

____________. Lange and Nietzsche. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1983.

____________. ‘Kant and Nietzsche’s Analysis of Knowledge’. Diálogos (1987), 22/49, pp. 7-40.

____________. ‘Kant, Lange and Nietzsche: Critique of Knowledge’. In: ANSELL-PEARSON, K. (org.) Nietzsche and Modern German Thought. London: Routledge, 1991, pp. 30-58.

TEICHMÜLLER, G. Aristotelischen Forschungen. 3 vols., Halle: Barthel, 1867-1873.

____________. Über die Reihenfolge der platonischen Dialoge. Leipzig: Köhler, 1879.

____________. Neue Studien zur Geschichte der Begriffe. 3 vols., Gotha: Perthes, 1879.

____________. Die wirkliche und die scheinbare Welt. Neue Grundlegung der Metaphysik. Breslau: Koebner, 1882.

ÜBERWEG, F. Grundriß der Geschichte der Philosophie von Thales bis auf die Gegenwart. 3 vols., Berlin: Mittler, 1866-1867.

WEISS, S. D. ‘Nietzsche and the Thing in Itself: Surviving Modern Kant Scholarship’. International Studies in Philosophy (1993), 25/2, pp. 79-84.

WOOD, A. W. Kant’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Downloads

Publicado

2019-03-06

Edição

n. 29 (2011)

Seção

Artigos Originais

Licença

Licença Creative Commons
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.